Flow control technology readiness: Aerodynamic versus hydrodynamic

Ronald D. Joslin; Robert F. Kunz; David R. Stinebring

doi:10.2514/6.2000-4412

Flow control technology readiness: Aerodynamic versus hydrodynamic

Ronald D. Joslin, Robert F. Kunz, David R. Stinebring

Mechanical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper will review some of the recent successful applications of flow control in air related to the potential transition of these technologies to underwater applications. Most of the early work in flow control focused on steady aerodynamic benefits. More recent technologies have linked unsteady technology development with an understanding of unsteady flow physics. Such time-dependency requires more complex control methodologies and potentially alternate sensory information for control. From the survey, we find that flow control technologies are reaching higher technology readiness levels for aerodynamic applications compared with hydrodynamic applications.

Original language	English (US)
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4412
State	Published - 2000
Event	18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2000 - Denver, CO, United States Duration: Aug 14 2000 → Aug 17 2000

Other

Other	18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2000
Country/Territory	United States
City	Denver, CO
Period	8/14/00 → 8/17/00

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Aerospace Engineering
Mechanical Engineering

Access to Document

10.2514/6.2000-4412

Cite this

@conference{4e5bbdd0479e4f7b86cb1926082a138d,

title = "Flow control technology readiness: Aerodynamic versus hydrodynamic",

abstract = "The paper will review some of the recent successful applications of flow control in air related to the potential transition of these technologies to underwater applications. Most of the early work in flow control focused on steady aerodynamic benefits. More recent technologies have linked unsteady technology development with an understanding of unsteady flow physics. Such time-dependency requires more complex control methodologies and potentially alternate sensory information for control. From the survey, we find that flow control technologies are reaching higher technology readiness levels for aerodynamic applications compared with hydrodynamic applications.",

author = "Joslin, {Ronald D.} and Kunz, {Robert F.} and Stinebring, {David R.}",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgment. This research was supported in part by Grants-inAid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (to S.U.).; 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2000 ; Conference date: 14-08-2000 Through 17-08-2000",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.2514/6.2000-4412",

language = "English (US)",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Flow control technology readiness

T2 - 18th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2000

AU - Joslin, Ronald D.

AU - Kunz, Robert F.

AU - Stinebring, David R.

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgment. This research was supported in part by Grants-inAid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (to S.U.).

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The paper will review some of the recent successful applications of flow control in air related to the potential transition of these technologies to underwater applications. Most of the early work in flow control focused on steady aerodynamic benefits. More recent technologies have linked unsteady technology development with an understanding of unsteady flow physics. Such time-dependency requires more complex control methodologies and potentially alternate sensory information for control. From the survey, we find that flow control technologies are reaching higher technology readiness levels for aerodynamic applications compared with hydrodynamic applications.

AB - The paper will review some of the recent successful applications of flow control in air related to the potential transition of these technologies to underwater applications. Most of the early work in flow control focused on steady aerodynamic benefits. More recent technologies have linked unsteady technology development with an understanding of unsteady flow physics. Such time-dependency requires more complex control methodologies and potentially alternate sensory information for control. From the survey, we find that flow control technologies are reaching higher technology readiness levels for aerodynamic applications compared with hydrodynamic applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087606356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087606356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/6.2000-4412

DO - 10.2514/6.2000-4412

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85087606356

Y2 - 14 August 2000 through 17 August 2000

ER -

Flow control technology readiness: Aerodynamic versus hydrodynamic

Abstract

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this