Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Foraging, Farming or Shopping? A Decision Matrix Approach for Food Environment Assessments

  • Lilly Zeitler
  • , Suwichan Phatthanaphraiwan
  • , Shauna Downs
  • , Bronwen Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Food environments (the interfaces between consumers and the broader food system) shape dietary change and associated health outcomes. Characteristics of food environments (e.g., availability, accessibility, affordability, convenience, desirability) can influence consumer decision-making around food acquisition in different types of food environments (e.g., informal and formal markets, wild and cultivated natural environments). With the novel decision matrix approach presented in this paper, we aimed to develop a simple and rapid tool for collecting perceived evaluations and preferences of different types and characteristics of food environments. The decision matrix results were triangulated using a mixed methodology of geolocated participant observation, participatory mapping, market price comparisons and qualitative interviews. The decision matrix results were compared to the reported use of different food environment types in an Indigenous Pgaz K’Nyau community in Northern Thailand. Despite an ongoing food environment transition, participants preferred natural food environments and ranked market environments most poorly, largely reflecting actual food environment use. Interviewees stressed the importance of flavor and food safety, citing concerns over agrochemical contamination of market foods. The proposed decision matrix and mixed methods approach provides a rapid data collection method that can be used by food environment researchers and public health practitioners to assess food environment preferences and perceptions that influence decision-making in food environment transitions in low- and middle-income countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number711
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pollution
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foraging, Farming or Shopping? A Decision Matrix Approach for Food Environment Assessments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this