Abstract
Volume-outcome relationships are of clear importance for most participants in the health-care industry; research and appropriate policy implications are of critical importance. In this letter we critique the prevailing 'learning-by-doing' view in cardiac surgery. We illustrate the very wide disparity in empirical findings on volume-outcome relationships there, in the context of broader open issues in 'learning curves' in general. Potential complementary mechanisms, e.g. 'social learning by knowledge spillovers' are introduced; these cast into doubt the prevailing policy recommendations of simple regionalization and volume smoothing.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 855-862 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Health economics |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forgetting the learning curve for a moment: How much performance is unrelated to own experience?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver