TY - JOUR
T1 - Forming and Sustaining a Learning Community and Developing Implicit Collective Goals in an Open Future Learning Space
AU - Rook, Michael M.
AU - Özkan‐bekiroglu, Saliha
AU - Tietjen, Phil
AU - Choi, Koun
AU - McDonald, Scott P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This study investigates the role of space, material, and affect in undergraduate and graduate students’ lived experiences within an open Future Learning Space. Future Learning Spaces (FLSs) blend the latest in architectural advances for space design (e.g., modern, flexible furniture within collaborative environments that provide bring‐your‐own‐device [BYOD] connectivity) and advances in perspectives on learning and instruction (e.g., situated learning, distributed cognition, learning communities, knowledge building, collective inquiry; Hod, 2017). Findings suggest that the FLS was able to: (1) bring together individuals by producing individual and shared affective responses; (2) hold community together and inform perceptions; as well as (3) move the community together and shape practices. This study indicates that open FLSs are complex systems constructed by users, and users of open FLSs can meet some of the criteria for a learning community (LC), especially if we broaden the definitions to take into account implicit versions of an LC.
AB - This study investigates the role of space, material, and affect in undergraduate and graduate students’ lived experiences within an open Future Learning Space. Future Learning Spaces (FLSs) blend the latest in architectural advances for space design (e.g., modern, flexible furniture within collaborative environments that provide bring‐your‐own‐device [BYOD] connectivity) and advances in perspectives on learning and instruction (e.g., situated learning, distributed cognition, learning communities, knowledge building, collective inquiry; Hod, 2017). Findings suggest that the FLS was able to: (1) bring together individuals by producing individual and shared affective responses; (2) hold community together and inform perceptions; as well as (3) move the community together and shape practices. This study indicates that open FLSs are complex systems constructed by users, and users of open FLSs can meet some of the criteria for a learning community (LC), especially if we broaden the definitions to take into account implicit versions of an LC.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102931604
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102931604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102931604
SN - 2158-6195
VL - 9
SP - 19
EP - 30
JO - Journal of Learning Spaces
JF - Journal of Learning Spaces
IS - 1
ER -