TY - JOUR
T1 - Framing a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teachers
AU - Weiland, Travis
AU - Orrill, Chandra Hawley
AU - Nagar, Gili Gal
AU - Brown, Rachael Eriksen
AU - Burke, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Proportional reasoning is foundational in school mathematics. Despite the importance of proportional reasoning, little has been written about the knowledge needed for teachers to teach proportional reasoning relative to its importance. In this paper, we present an initial definition for a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teaching based on synthesizing past scholarship in conjunction with an empirical study of the knowledge resources practicing teachers use to make sense of proportional reasoning tasks. As a result of this effort, we present here an initial framing of operationalized knowledge resources based upon our definition for a robust understanding that could be used as an analytic tool. We also describe how such a framework of knowledge resources is useful in the context of teacher education, and we provide an example of how the framework was used to analyze the knowledge resources a teacher employed to make sense of a proportional reasoning task. We end by discussing possible implications our framework has for designing teacher education experiences and further research that is needed.
AB - Proportional reasoning is foundational in school mathematics. Despite the importance of proportional reasoning, little has been written about the knowledge needed for teachers to teach proportional reasoning relative to its importance. In this paper, we present an initial definition for a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teaching based on synthesizing past scholarship in conjunction with an empirical study of the knowledge resources practicing teachers use to make sense of proportional reasoning tasks. As a result of this effort, we present here an initial framing of operationalized knowledge resources based upon our definition for a robust understanding that could be used as an analytic tool. We also describe how such a framework of knowledge resources is useful in the context of teacher education, and we provide an example of how the framework was used to analyze the knowledge resources a teacher employed to make sense of a proportional reasoning task. We end by discussing possible implications our framework has for designing teacher education experiences and further research that is needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077269411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077269411&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0
DO - 10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077269411
SN - 1386-4416
VL - 24
SP - 179
EP - 202
JO - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
JF - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
IS - 2
ER -