TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface
T2 - A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English
AU - Hopp, Holger
AU - Bail, Joseph
AU - Jackson, Carrie N.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank three anonymous reviewers and the editor for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation under grant OISE-0968369 (PI: JF Kroll; co-PIs: PE Dussias and JG van Hell).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - The present study investigates whether second language (L2) speakers are sensitive to the information-structural constraints and frequency distributions at the syntax–discourse interface in the L2. L1-German–L2-English and L1-English–L2-German speakers completed a speeded naturalness judgment task. For sentences presented in broad or narrow-focus contexts, they judged the naturalness of fronted locative (LP) and temporal (TP) adverbial phrases and fronted objects in both English and German. English and German differ in the frequency with which they employ these constructions. With high-frequency fronted-LP and TP sentences, both the L2 English and L2 German speakers exhibited equivalent judgments as their L1 counterparts, in spite of differences in the perceived naturalness and relative frequency of these constructions in English vs. German. Like L1 speakers, L2 English and L2 German speakers also judged the less-frequent fronted objects as more natural in narrow-focus than broad-focus contexts, showing successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. However, they judged fronted object sentences as more natural overall than their respective L1 counterparts in both English and German. Together, these findings suggest that convergence at the L2 syntax–discourse interface is possible per se, but that lower construction frequency in the input entails persistent overgeneralization of non-canonical options in the L2.
AB - The present study investigates whether second language (L2) speakers are sensitive to the information-structural constraints and frequency distributions at the syntax–discourse interface in the L2. L1-German–L2-English and L1-English–L2-German speakers completed a speeded naturalness judgment task. For sentences presented in broad or narrow-focus contexts, they judged the naturalness of fronted locative (LP) and temporal (TP) adverbial phrases and fronted objects in both English and German. English and German differ in the frequency with which they employ these constructions. With high-frequency fronted-LP and TP sentences, both the L2 English and L2 German speakers exhibited equivalent judgments as their L1 counterparts, in spite of differences in the perceived naturalness and relative frequency of these constructions in English vs. German. Like L1 speakers, L2 English and L2 German speakers also judged the less-frequent fronted objects as more natural in narrow-focus than broad-focus contexts, showing successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. However, they judged fronted object sentences as more natural overall than their respective L1 counterparts in both English and German. Together, these findings suggest that convergence at the L2 syntax–discourse interface is possible per se, but that lower construction frequency in the input entails persistent overgeneralization of non-canonical options in the L2.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058707963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058707963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0267658318802985
DO - 10.1177/0267658318802985
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058707963
SN - 0267-6583
VL - 36
SP - 65
EP - 96
JO - Second Language Research
JF - Second Language Research
IS - 1
ER -