TY - JOUR
T1 - From description to explanation
T2 - Integrating across multiple levels of analysis to inform neuroscientific accounts of dimensional personality pathology
AU - Allen, Timothy A.
AU - Schreiber, Alison M.
AU - Hall, Nathan T.
AU - Hallquist, Michael N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Guilford Press.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Dimensional approaches to psychiatric nosology are rapidly transforming the way researchers and clinicians conceptualize personality pathology, leading to a growing interest in describing how individuals differ from one another. Yet, in order to successfully prevent and treat personality pathology, it is also necessary to explain the sources of these individual differences. The emerging field of personality neuroscience is well-positioned to guide the transition from description to explanation within personality pathology research. However, establishing comprehensive, mechanistic accounts of personality pathology will require personality neuroscientists to move beyond atheoretical studies that link trait differences to neural correlates without considering the algorithmic processes that are carried out by those correlates. We highlight some of the dangers we see in overpopulating personality neuroscience with brain-trait associational studies and offer a series of recommendations for personality neuroscientists seeking to build explanatory theories of personality pathology.
AB - Dimensional approaches to psychiatric nosology are rapidly transforming the way researchers and clinicians conceptualize personality pathology, leading to a growing interest in describing how individuals differ from one another. Yet, in order to successfully prevent and treat personality pathology, it is also necessary to explain the sources of these individual differences. The emerging field of personality neuroscience is well-positioned to guide the transition from description to explanation within personality pathology research. However, establishing comprehensive, mechanistic accounts of personality pathology will require personality neuroscientists to move beyond atheoretical studies that link trait differences to neural correlates without considering the algorithmic processes that are carried out by those correlates. We highlight some of the dangers we see in overpopulating personality neuroscience with brain-trait associational studies and offer a series of recommendations for personality neuroscientists seeking to build explanatory theories of personality pathology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092932164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092932164&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/pedi.2020.34.5.650
DO - 10.1521/pedi.2020.34.5.650
M3 - Article
C2 - 33074057
AN - SCOPUS:85092932164
SN - 0885-579X
VL - 34
SP - 650
EP - 676
JO - Journal of personality disorders
JF - Journal of personality disorders
IS - 5
ER -