From the Archives of the AFIP. Enchondroma versus Chondrosarcoma in the Appendicular Skeleton: Differentiating Features

Mark D. Murphey, Donald J. Flemming, Steven R. Boyea, John A. Bojescul, Donald E. Sweet, H. Thomas Temple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

287 Scopus citations

Abstract

Distinction of enchondroma versus intramedullary chondrosarcoma affecting the appendicular skeleton (proximal to the metacarpals and metatarsals) is a frequent diagnostic dilemma. The authors studied a large series of patients with these lesions (92 with enchondromas, 95 with chondrosarcomas) using statistical assessment of both clinical parameters and numerous radiologic manifestations on images from multiple modalities to identify differentiating features. Multiple clinical and imaging parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma, particularly pain related to the lesion, deep endosteal scalloping (greater than two-thirds of cortical thickness), cortical destruction and soft-tissue mass (at computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), periosteal reaction (at radiography), and marked uptake of radionuclide (greater than the anterior iliac crest) at bone scintigraphy. All of these features strongly suggested the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma. These criteria allow distinction of appendicular enchondroma and chondrosarcoma in at least 90% of cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1213-1237
Number of pages25
JournalRadiographics
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From the Archives of the AFIP. Enchondroma versus Chondrosarcoma in the Appendicular Skeleton: Differentiating Features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this