Fundamental differences between newtonian and Non-Newtonian Micro-EHL results

Liming Chang, W. Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations


Numerical analyses ofmicro-EHL problems have shown remarkably different results with Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models. However, no consensus has been reached whether a Newtonian model can be used in micro-EHL analysis. It is difficult to prove the point numerically as researchers use different numerical methods, grid sizes, time steps, and convergence criteria. This paper analytically studies the fundamental differences between Newtonian and non-Newtonian micro- EHL results. Algebraic governing equations are derived in terms of dimensionless parameters of the problem. Results are obtained for a range of key dimensionless parameters of practical interest. These results suggest that Newtonian and non- Newtonian micro-EHL results would be qualitatively different and the differences would be most pronounced with surface roughness of short wavelengths. Since surface roughness of machine elements contains substantial short-wavelength contents, a Newtonian rheological model is likely to generate misleading micro-EHL results under all operating conditions under which the shear-thinning effect of the lubricant is significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Tribology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Surfaces and Interfaces
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films


Dive into the research topics of 'Fundamental differences between newtonian and Non-Newtonian Micro-EHL results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this