Gadolinium-enhanced computed tomographic angiography: Current status

Alex Rosioreanu, Ronald A. Alberico, Alan Litwin, Man Hon, Zachary D. Grossman, Douglas S. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


This article reviews the research to date, as well as our clinical experience from two institutions, on gadolinium-enhanced computed tomographic angiography (gCTA) for imaging the body. gCTA may be an appropriate examination for the small percentage of patients who would benefit from noninvasive vascular imaging, but who have contraindications to both iodinated contrast and magnetic resonance imaging. gCTA is more expensive than CTA with iodinated contrast, due to the dose of gadolinium administered, and gCTA has limitations compared with CTA with iodinated contrast, in that parenchymal organs are not optimally enhanced at doses of 0.5 mmol/kg or lower. However, in our experience, gCTA has been a very useful problem-solving examination in carefully selected patients. With the advent of 16-64 detector CT, in combination with bolus tracking, we believe that the overall dose of gadolinium needed for diagnostic CTA examinations, while relatively high, can be safely administered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-219
Number of pages13
JournalCurrent Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Gadolinium-enhanced computed tomographic angiography: Current status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this