Generalization training in special education teacher preparation: Does it exist?

Andrew Markelz, Benjamin Riden, Mary Catherine Scheeler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


Enormous resources are committed by universities to prepare special educators to impact student outcomes of our most vulnerable and neediest learners. Generalizing teaching skills from university to K-12 classrooms must be a component of teacher preparation curriculum; otherwise, we continue to merely train our teacher candidates and hope they sustain and generalize their newly acquired skills. Through self-reported surveys and extant data analysis, we identify the extent to which our sample of special education teacher preparation programs are teaching their teacher candidates to generalize newly acquired teaching skills to in-service settings in K-12 classrooms. Results indicate ambiguity with familiarity of generalization techniques and fidelity of implementation. Programming for generalization is absent in reviewed course syllabi, and student teaching supervisors report a disconnect between university and classroom realities. We recommend a systematic approach to programming for generalization by increasing awareness of generalization techniques through professional development, including accountability measures in course syllabi, focusing on high-leverage practices to create more cohesive preparation programs, and improving communication between instructors and student teaching supervisors. Limitations and future research recommendations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-193
Number of pages15
JournalTeacher Education and Special Education
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Generalization training in special education teacher preparation: Does it exist?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this