TY - JOUR
T1 - Generative AI in Higher Education Constituent Relationship Management (CRM)
T2 - Opportunities, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies
AU - Marcinkevage, Carrie
AU - Kumar, Akhil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - This research explores opportunities for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education constituent (customer) relationship management (CRM) to address the industry’s need for digital transformation driven by demographic shifts, economic challenges, and technological advancements. Using a qualitative research approach grounded in the principles of grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews and an open-ended qualitative data collection instrument with technology vendors, implementation consultants, and HEI professionals that are actively exploring GenAI applications. Our findings highlight six primary types of GenAI—textual analysis and synthesis, data summarization, next-best action recommendations, speech synthesis and translation, code development, and image and video creation—each with applications across student recruitment, advising, alumni engagement, and administrative processes. We propose an evaluative framework with eight readiness criteria to assess institutional preparedness for GenAI adoption. While GenAI offers potential benefits, such as increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved student engagement, its success depends on data readiness, ethical safeguards, and institutional leadership. By integrating GenAI as a co-intelligence alongside human expertise, HEIs can enhance CRM ecosystems and better support their constituents.
AB - This research explores opportunities for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education constituent (customer) relationship management (CRM) to address the industry’s need for digital transformation driven by demographic shifts, economic challenges, and technological advancements. Using a qualitative research approach grounded in the principles of grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews and an open-ended qualitative data collection instrument with technology vendors, implementation consultants, and HEI professionals that are actively exploring GenAI applications. Our findings highlight six primary types of GenAI—textual analysis and synthesis, data summarization, next-best action recommendations, speech synthesis and translation, code development, and image and video creation—each with applications across student recruitment, advising, alumni engagement, and administrative processes. We propose an evaluative framework with eight readiness criteria to assess institutional preparedness for GenAI adoption. While GenAI offers potential benefits, such as increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved student engagement, its success depends on data readiness, ethical safeguards, and institutional leadership. By integrating GenAI as a co-intelligence alongside human expertise, HEIs can enhance CRM ecosystems and better support their constituents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001114309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001114309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/computers14030101
DO - 10.3390/computers14030101
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001114309
SN - 2073-431X
VL - 14
JO - Computers
JF - Computers
IS - 3
M1 - 101
ER -