TY - JOUR
T1 - Genetic control of T-cell proliferative responses to poly(glu40ala60) and poly(glu51lys34tyr15)
T2 - Subregion-specific inhibition of the responses with monoclonal Ia antibodies
AU - Baxevanis, Constantin N.
AU - Wernet, Dorothee
AU - Nagy, Zoltan A.
AU - Maurer, Paul H.
AU - Klein, Jan
PY - 1980/12
Y1 - 1980/12
N2 - The relationship between Ir genes and Ia antigens was studied in the T-cell proliferative responses to two synthetic polypeptides poly(glu40ala60) (GA) and poly(glu51lys34tyr15) (GLT15). The response to GA was found to be controlled by an Ir gene in the I-A subregion, whereas the anti-GLT15 response was shown to be under dual control, one Ir gene mapping probably in the I-A subregion, and the other in the I-E subregion. We obtained two different lines of evidence suggesting identity of Ir and Ia genes. First, the presence of certain serologically identified allelic forms of the I-A-encoded A molecule correlated with the responder status to GA both in inbred strains and in B10.W lines, the latter carrying wild-derived H-2 haplotypes. Thus the Ir and Ia phenotypes were not separable in strains of independent origin. Second, the anti-GA response was completely inhibited by monoclonal antibodies against determinants on the A molecule (Ia.8, 15, and 19), but not by a monoclonal antibody against a determinant on the E molecule (Ia.7). In contrast, the anti-GLT15 response was only inhibited by a monoclonal antibody against the E molecule, but not by antibodies against the A molecule. Our data support the hypothesis that Ia antigens, as restriction elements for T-cell recognition, may in fact be the phenotypic manifestation of Ir genes.
AB - The relationship between Ir genes and Ia antigens was studied in the T-cell proliferative responses to two synthetic polypeptides poly(glu40ala60) (GA) and poly(glu51lys34tyr15) (GLT15). The response to GA was found to be controlled by an Ir gene in the I-A subregion, whereas the anti-GLT15 response was shown to be under dual control, one Ir gene mapping probably in the I-A subregion, and the other in the I-E subregion. We obtained two different lines of evidence suggesting identity of Ir and Ia genes. First, the presence of certain serologically identified allelic forms of the I-A-encoded A molecule correlated with the responder status to GA both in inbred strains and in B10.W lines, the latter carrying wild-derived H-2 haplotypes. Thus the Ir and Ia phenotypes were not separable in strains of independent origin. Second, the anti-GA response was completely inhibited by monoclonal antibodies against determinants on the A molecule (Ia.8, 15, and 19), but not by a monoclonal antibody against a determinant on the E molecule (Ia.7). In contrast, the anti-GLT15 response was only inhibited by a monoclonal antibody against the E molecule, but not by antibodies against the A molecule. Our data support the hypothesis that Ia antigens, as restriction elements for T-cell recognition, may in fact be the phenotypic manifestation of Ir genes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019301531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019301531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF01567830
DO - 10.1007/BF01567830
M3 - Article
C2 - 6086092
AN - SCOPUS:0019301531
SN - 0093-7711
VL - 11
SP - 617
EP - 628
JO - Immunogenetics
JF - Immunogenetics
IS - 1
ER -