Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation

S. R. Bordenstein, M. D. Drapeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Dobzhansky-Muller (D-M) model of reproductive isolation (RI) posits that hybrid sterility and inviability result from negative epistatic interactions between alleles at a minimum of two genes. This standard model makes several implicit assumptions, including a lack of environmental effects and genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI) involving hybrid sterility and hybrid inviability loci. Here we relax this assumption of the standard D-M model. By doing so, several patterns of the genetic architecture of RI change. First, a novel single-locus model of postzygotic RI emerges. Several indirect lines of evidence are discussed in support of the model, but we conclude that this new single-locus model is currently no more supported than previous ones. Second, when multilocus D-M models incorporating GEI are considered, we find that the number of potential negative epistatic interactions increases dramatically over the number predicted by the standard D-M model, even when only the most simple case of two-allele interactions are considered. Third, these multilocus models suggest that some previous generalizations about the evolutionary genetics of postzygotic RI may not necessarily hold. Our findings also suggest that the evolution of postzygotic RI may be more likely when the expression of traits driving speciation is affected by the environment, since there appears to be a greater spectrum of potential hybrid incompatibilities under the D-M model incorporating GEI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-501
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this