TY - JOUR
T1 - Global DNA methylation
T2 - Comparison of enzymatic- and non-enzymatic-based methods
AU - Rocha, Monica S.
AU - Castro, Rita
AU - Rivera, Isabel
AU - Kok, Robert M.
AU - Smulders, Yvo M.
AU - Jakobs, Cornelis
AU - De Almeida, Isabel Tavares
AU - Blom, Henk J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partially supported by the F.C.T. (Fundac¸ão para a Ciência e Tecnologia; PTDC/SAU-GMG/68714/2006 and SFRH/ BD/41970/2007).
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background: The most frequently used methods for meas-uring global DNA methylation are based on two different principles: the use of methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases followed by analysis of the obtained fragments, or the hydrolysis of genomic DNA followed by specific detection and quantification of the 5-methylcytosine content. We aimed to compare two different methods for evaluation of global DNA methylation: the cytosine extension assay after enzymatic digestion of DNA (Cyt-Ext), and a recently described method using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry after DNA hydrolysis (LC-MS/MS). Methods: Both approaches were applied to evaluate global DNA methylation in leukocyte DNA from 96 healthy subjects. Calf thymus and pBR322 DNAs were used as hyper- and hypo-methylated references, respectively. Results: Using the Cyt-Ext method, the DNA from healthy individuals showed radiolabel incorporation of 11,312± 1600 Dpm/μg DNA, while the LC-MS/MS method showed 4.55±0.1% methylation. Results are shown as mean±SD. The analysis of hypo- and hyper-methylated references showed that both methods are practical for discriminating different levels of methylation. Conclusions: Cyt-Ext and LC-MS/MS are viable methods in evaluating global DNA methylation status. However, the LC-MS/MS assay allows absolute quantification and displays far superior intra-day precision. Therefore, we consider the later approach to be better for use in global DNA methylation studies.
AB - Background: The most frequently used methods for meas-uring global DNA methylation are based on two different principles: the use of methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases followed by analysis of the obtained fragments, or the hydrolysis of genomic DNA followed by specific detection and quantification of the 5-methylcytosine content. We aimed to compare two different methods for evaluation of global DNA methylation: the cytosine extension assay after enzymatic digestion of DNA (Cyt-Ext), and a recently described method using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry after DNA hydrolysis (LC-MS/MS). Methods: Both approaches were applied to evaluate global DNA methylation in leukocyte DNA from 96 healthy subjects. Calf thymus and pBR322 DNAs were used as hyper- and hypo-methylated references, respectively. Results: Using the Cyt-Ext method, the DNA from healthy individuals showed radiolabel incorporation of 11,312± 1600 Dpm/μg DNA, while the LC-MS/MS method showed 4.55±0.1% methylation. Results are shown as mean±SD. The analysis of hypo- and hyper-methylated references showed that both methods are practical for discriminating different levels of methylation. Conclusions: Cyt-Ext and LC-MS/MS are viable methods in evaluating global DNA methylation status. However, the LC-MS/MS assay allows absolute quantification and displays far superior intra-day precision. Therefore, we consider the later approach to be better for use in global DNA methylation studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78951484934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78951484934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/CCLM.2010.346
DO - 10.1515/CCLM.2010.346
M3 - Article
C2 - 20979561
AN - SCOPUS:78951484934
SN - 1434-6621
VL - 48
SP - 1793
EP - 1798
JO - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 12
ER -