Abstract
Background: The most frequently used methods for meas-uring global DNA methylation are based on two different principles: the use of methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases followed by analysis of the obtained fragments, or the hydrolysis of genomic DNA followed by specific detection and quantification of the 5-methylcytosine content. We aimed to compare two different methods for evaluation of global DNA methylation: the cytosine extension assay after enzymatic digestion of DNA (Cyt-Ext), and a recently described method using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry after DNA hydrolysis (LC-MS/MS). Methods: Both approaches were applied to evaluate global DNA methylation in leukocyte DNA from 96 healthy subjects. Calf thymus and pBR322 DNAs were used as hyper- and hypo-methylated references, respectively. Results: Using the Cyt-Ext method, the DNA from healthy individuals showed radiolabel incorporation of 11,312± 1600 Dpm/μg DNA, while the LC-MS/MS method showed 4.55±0.1% methylation. Results are shown as mean±SD. The analysis of hypo- and hyper-methylated references showed that both methods are practical for discriminating different levels of methylation. Conclusions: Cyt-Ext and LC-MS/MS are viable methods in evaluating global DNA methylation status. However, the LC-MS/MS assay allows absolute quantification and displays far superior intra-day precision. Therefore, we consider the later approach to be better for use in global DNA methylation studies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1793-1798 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2010 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Clinical Biochemistry
- Biochemistry, medical
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Global DNA methylation: Comparison of enzymatic- and non-enzymatic-based methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver