TY - JOUR
T1 - Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Dexter, Douglas D.
AU - Hughes, Charles A.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.
AB - This meta-analysis reviews experimental and quasiexperimental studies in which upper-elementary, intermediate, and secondary students with learning disabilities learned from graphic organizers. Following an exhaustive search for studies meeting specified design criteria, 55 standardized mean effect sizes were extracted from 16 articles involving 808 participants. Students at levels ranging from grade 4 to grade 12 used graphic organizers to learn in core-content classes (English/reading, science, social studies, mathematics). Posttests measured near and far transfer. Across several conditions, settings, and features, the use of graphic organizers was associated with increases in vocabulary knowledge, comprehension, and inferential knowledge. Mean effect sizes varied from moderate to large based on type of measure, type of graphic organizer, and subject area. Conclusions, implications for future research, and practical recommendations are presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955852353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955852353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/073194871103400104
DO - 10.1177/073194871103400104
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:79955852353
SN - 0731-9487
VL - 34
SP - 51
EP - 72
JO - Learning Disability Quarterly
JF - Learning Disability Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -