TY - JOUR
T1 - Green or nongreen innovation? Different strategic preferences among subsidized enterprises with different ownership types
AU - Liu, Zimeng
AU - Li, Xu
AU - Peng, Xuerong
AU - Lee, Seoki
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 71602176 & 71471042 ) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number 2017T100274 & 2016M600288 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Governments often turn to subsidies to boost enterprises’ innovation activities, which gives subsidized enterprises room for allocating the subsidies among different innovation activities. Taking insights from institutional logic theory, this paper proposes that enterprises exhibit different subsidy-allocation behaviors between nongreen and green innovations and that the positive effect of subsidies on nongreen innovation is greater than that on green innovation due to the double-spillover problem that is pertinent to green innovation. Further, this paper argues that innovation intensity varies from privately-owned enterprises to local and central state-owned enterprises and that the underlying reason for this phenomenon is that enterprises with different ownership structures behave with different institutional logics, face different environmental and innovation pressures, and hold different innovative resource and capability endowments. We test these hypotheses by using longitudinal data (2010–2015) on 175 publicly-traded firms in the pharmaceutical industry in China. Overall, the results support most of the hypotheses.
AB - Governments often turn to subsidies to boost enterprises’ innovation activities, which gives subsidized enterprises room for allocating the subsidies among different innovation activities. Taking insights from institutional logic theory, this paper proposes that enterprises exhibit different subsidy-allocation behaviors between nongreen and green innovations and that the positive effect of subsidies on nongreen innovation is greater than that on green innovation due to the double-spillover problem that is pertinent to green innovation. Further, this paper argues that innovation intensity varies from privately-owned enterprises to local and central state-owned enterprises and that the underlying reason for this phenomenon is that enterprises with different ownership structures behave with different institutional logics, face different environmental and innovation pressures, and hold different innovative resource and capability endowments. We test these hypotheses by using longitudinal data (2010–2015) on 175 publicly-traded firms in the pharmaceutical industry in China. Overall, the results support most of the hypotheses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074415387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074415387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118786
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118786
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074415387
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 245
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 118786
ER -