TY - JOUR
T1 - Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Norwegian Agriculture
T2 - Costs or Benefits?
AU - Blandford, David
AU - Gaasland, Ivar
AU - Vårdal, Erling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE).
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.
AB - Agriculture, which currently accounts for 0.3 per cent of Norway's gross domestic product, is estimated to generate roughly 13 per cent of the country's emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Norway has proposed a reduction of 40 per cent in its total emissions in the run up to the international climate change conference in Paris in December 2015. High levels of protection mean that Norway is a closed economy as far as agriculture is concerned. Agriculture is also highly subsidised. We estimate a marginal abatement cost curve for agriculture. Since producers, consumers and taxpayers would all be affected if emissions reductions are imposed on agriculture, we calculate abatement costs in terms of national economic welfare. We find that a cut of around 30 per cent in emissions from agriculture can be achieved, without undermining the stated policy objective of ensuring a minimum supply of domestically-produced calories, by taking drained peatland out of production and restoring it to wetland. Progressing beyond a 30 per cent reduction requires a more fundamental restructuring of production away from emissions-intensive ruminants and towards less emissions-intensive crop and livestock products. Emissions reductions of over 60 per cent can be achieved with no reductions in national economic welfare, due to reductions in agricultural subsidies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939454309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939454309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1746-692X.12089
DO - 10.1111/1746-692X.12089
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939454309
SN - 1478-0917
VL - 14
SP - 34
EP - 40
JO - EuroChoices
JF - EuroChoices
IS - 2
ER -