TY - JOUR
T1 - Groupness perceptions and basic need satisfaction
T2 - Perceptions of fitness groups and experiences within club environments
AU - Evans, M. Blair
AU - Graupensperger, Scott
AU - Benson, Alex J.
AU - Eys, Mark
AU - Hastings, Bryce
AU - Gottschall, Jinger S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Group-based settings are valuable for promoting physical activity when individuals perceive high groupness, or when they feel like they are exercising in a true group (Spink, Wilson, & Priebe, 2010). Guided by basic needs theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), we tested a mechanistic model that examined the extent that groupness perceptions within fitness classes predicted satisfaction of basic needs (i.e., competence, relatedness, and autonomy) and, in turn, basic needs predicted general satisfaction as well as weekly group fitness bouts. Exercisers in fitness facilities in the United States and New Zealand (N = 293, Mage = 35.93, SD = 11.44, 78% female, 22% male) completed a survey directly following a class entailing groupness subscales of Entitativity (e.g., perceiving the collective as a group) and Group Structure (e.g., reporting group norms), followed by an online survey 3 weeks afterward. Multiple mediation models revealed an indirect effect of groupness subscales through basic need satisfaction, on both general satisfaction and weekly fitness bouts. Autonomy and relatedness were the strongest mediators when predicting general satisfaction, whereas relatedness was the strongest mediator when predicting weekly fitness bouts. These findings support the use of basic needs theory for understanding how exercisers are influenced by their groups. Practically, groupness-enhancing strategies have the potential to impact belongingness along with competence and autonomy perceptions as critical evaluations for promoting health behavior.
AB - Group-based settings are valuable for promoting physical activity when individuals perceive high groupness, or when they feel like they are exercising in a true group (Spink, Wilson, & Priebe, 2010). Guided by basic needs theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), we tested a mechanistic model that examined the extent that groupness perceptions within fitness classes predicted satisfaction of basic needs (i.e., competence, relatedness, and autonomy) and, in turn, basic needs predicted general satisfaction as well as weekly group fitness bouts. Exercisers in fitness facilities in the United States and New Zealand (N = 293, Mage = 35.93, SD = 11.44, 78% female, 22% male) completed a survey directly following a class entailing groupness subscales of Entitativity (e.g., perceiving the collective as a group) and Group Structure (e.g., reporting group norms), followed by an online survey 3 weeks afterward. Multiple mediation models revealed an indirect effect of groupness subscales through basic need satisfaction, on both general satisfaction and weekly fitness bouts. Autonomy and relatedness were the strongest mediators when predicting general satisfaction, whereas relatedness was the strongest mediator when predicting weekly fitness bouts. These findings support the use of basic needs theory for understanding how exercisers are influenced by their groups. Practically, groupness-enhancing strategies have the potential to impact belongingness along with competence and autonomy perceptions as critical evaluations for promoting health behavior.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067585247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067585247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/gdn0000103
DO - 10.1037/gdn0000103
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067585247
SN - 1089-2699
VL - 23
SP - 170
EP - 184
JO - Group Dynamics
JF - Group Dynamics
IS - 3-4
ER -