Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

  • Charles H. Cho
  • , Steven W. Hwang
  • , Daniel J. Mazanec
  • , John E. O'Toole
  • , William C. Watters
  • , Thiru M. Annaswamy
  • , Allan L. Brook
  • , David S. Cheng
  • , Sean D. Christie
  • , Zachary A. Cupler
  • , Dennis E. Enix
  • , Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach
  • , Justin M. Goehl
  • , George Alexander Jones
  • , Piyush Kalakoti
  • , Manish K. Kasliwal
  • , Niranjan U. Kavadi
  • , Cumhur Kilincer
  • , Justin M. Lantz
  • , Gazanfar Rahmathulla
  • Tom Reinsel, K. Aaron Shaw, Ahmed Shawky Abdelgawaad, Amy M. Skuteris, Jeffrey A. Stone, Andrea L. Strayer, Andrew N. Vo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures features evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of September 2020. PURPOSE: The purpose of the guideline is to provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists when making clinical decisions for adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence-based guideline recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with this condition. STUDY DESIGN: This is a guideline summary review. METHODS: This guideline is the product of NASS’ Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee. The methods used to develop this guideline are detailed in the complete guideline and technical report available on the NASS website. In brief, a multidisciplinary work group of spine care specialists convened to identify clinical questions to address in the guideline. The literature search strategy was developed in consultation with a medical librarian. Upon completion of the systematic literature search, evidence relevant to the clinical questions posed in the guideline was reviewed. Work group members utilized NASS evidentiary table templates to summarize study conclusions, identify study strengths and weaknesses, and assign levels of evidence. Work group members participated in recommendation meetings to update and formulate evidence-based recommendations and incorporate expert opinion when necessary. The draft guideline was submitted to an internal and external peer review process and ultimately approved by the NASS Board of Directors. RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical questions were addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence of the supporting literature. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-based clinical guideline has been created using techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, literature search parameters, literature attrition flowchart, suggestions for future research, and all of the references, is available electronically on the NASS website at http://www.spine.org/guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1670-1687
Number of pages18
JournalSpine Journal
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this