TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for Proper Reporting of Clinical Significance, Including Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Maximal Outcome Improvement
AU - Harris, Joshua D.
AU - Brand, Jefferson C.
AU - Cote, Mark
AU - Waterman, Brian
AU - Dhawan, Aman
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: J.B. reports personal fees as Assistant Editor-in-Chief for Arthroscopy, outside the submitted work. M.C. received travel support to attend the Arthroscopy Editors Meeting. He reports board or editorial membership of AANA and Arthroscopy. A.D. reports consulting fees from Arthrex and Smith and Nephew. He has received grants from the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and Pennsylvania State University. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material .
Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: J.B. reports personal fees as Assistant Editor-in-Chief for Arthroscopy, outside the submitted work. M.C. received travel support to attend the Arthroscopy Editors Meeting. He reports board or editorial membership of AANA and Arthroscopy. A.D. reports consulting fees from Arthrex and Smith and Nephew. He has received grants from the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense, and Pennsylvania State University. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) need to be responsive, reliable, and validated for the specific condition or treatment. PROMs also need to exhibit a dose-dependent response across a diverse patient population, unlimited by floor and ceiling effects. Statistically significant differences between compared groups might not always represent clinically important differences. Measures of clinical significance reflect a spectrum of patient satisfaction after an intervention. A noticeable difference to the patient is assessed with minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient satisfaction by patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and a “considerable” improvement by substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Clinical relevance measured by these clinically significant outcomes (CSO) are limited by ceiling effects. Maximal outcome improvement (MOI) might more accurately account for patients with higher baseline or preoperative PROMs, thereby limiting ceiling effects. The acts of measuring (and reporting) patient-centered endpoints may actually be of greater importance than collecting objective clinician-measured data. As the old surgeon's aphorism goes, “nothing ruins good results like good follow-up.”
AB - Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) need to be responsive, reliable, and validated for the specific condition or treatment. PROMs also need to exhibit a dose-dependent response across a diverse patient population, unlimited by floor and ceiling effects. Statistically significant differences between compared groups might not always represent clinically important differences. Measures of clinical significance reflect a spectrum of patient satisfaction after an intervention. A noticeable difference to the patient is assessed with minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient satisfaction by patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and a “considerable” improvement by substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Clinical relevance measured by these clinically significant outcomes (CSO) are limited by ceiling effects. Maximal outcome improvement (MOI) might more accurately account for patients with higher baseline or preoperative PROMs, thereby limiting ceiling effects. The acts of measuring (and reporting) patient-centered endpoints may actually be of greater importance than collecting objective clinician-measured data. As the old surgeon's aphorism goes, “nothing ruins good results like good follow-up.”
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145645819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145645819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.020
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 36603987
AN - SCOPUS:85145645819
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 39
SP - 145
EP - 150
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 2
ER -