TY - JOUR
T1 - Gynaecological care of women with chronic pelvic pain
T2 - Patient perspectives and care preferences
AU - Ross, Whitney Trotter
AU - Snyder, Bethany
AU - Stuckey, Heather
AU - Ross, Ian R.
AU - McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer
AU - Harkins, Gerald J.
AU - Smith, Carly P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by a grant from the Penn State Health Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The Qualitative and Mixed Methods Core at Penn State Health provided the qualitative analysis management and coding for this project. The REDCap database management of this project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grants UL1 TR002014 and UL1 TR00045. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. No external peer review of this study was required. The funders had no role in the conduct, reporting or writing of this study.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Christy Stetter, BS, public health scientist at Penn State University, Department of Public Health Sciences, Hershey, PA, USA, for her assistance with quantitative statistical analyses and REDCap database creation and management.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Objective: To explore the experiences and care preferences of women with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, seeking gynaecological care. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Ambulatory endometriosis centre. Population or Sample: Women aged 18–55 years with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: Baseline demographics and sexual trauma history were obtained, and participants were assigned to focus groups according to a positive (four groups, 13 participants) or negative (two groups, nine participants) screen for a history of sexual trauma. The focus groups were led by a clinical psychologist and a gynaecological surgeon and consisted of semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were coded in NVivo 12. Main outcome measures: Content analysis was used to derive themes according to the participants' own words. Results: Participants with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, experienced delay in diagnosis and repetitive dismissals by clinicians. Participants' experiences of dismissals included: clinicians not listening, insufficient allocation of time to appointments and perceived redundant medical testing (i.e. sexually transmitted infection testing, urine cultures, ultrasounds). Participants identified clinician interactions as pivotal in coping with both pelvic pain and sexual abuse. Participants also provided feedback regarding trauma-informed practices and care delivery specific to patients with chronic pelvic pain. Conclusion: Patients with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, report negative experiences when interacting with the healthcare system. They have clear needs and preferences regarding gynaecological care and provide feasible suggestions for improving care delivery.
AB - Objective: To explore the experiences and care preferences of women with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, seeking gynaecological care. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Ambulatory endometriosis centre. Population or Sample: Women aged 18–55 years with chronic pelvic pain. Methods: Baseline demographics and sexual trauma history were obtained, and participants were assigned to focus groups according to a positive (four groups, 13 participants) or negative (two groups, nine participants) screen for a history of sexual trauma. The focus groups were led by a clinical psychologist and a gynaecological surgeon and consisted of semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were coded in NVivo 12. Main outcome measures: Content analysis was used to derive themes according to the participants' own words. Results: Participants with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, experienced delay in diagnosis and repetitive dismissals by clinicians. Participants' experiences of dismissals included: clinicians not listening, insufficient allocation of time to appointments and perceived redundant medical testing (i.e. sexually transmitted infection testing, urine cultures, ultrasounds). Participants identified clinician interactions as pivotal in coping with both pelvic pain and sexual abuse. Participants also provided feedback regarding trauma-informed practices and care delivery specific to patients with chronic pelvic pain. Conclusion: Patients with chronic pelvic pain, with or without a history of sexual trauma, report negative experiences when interacting with the healthcare system. They have clear needs and preferences regarding gynaecological care and provide feasible suggestions for improving care delivery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144058384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144058384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.17355
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.17355
M3 - Article
C2 - 36457127
AN - SCOPUS:85144058384
SN - 1470-0328
VL - 130
SP - 476
EP - 484
JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
IS - 5
ER -