TY - JOUR
T1 - Hand in glove
T2 - Brain and skull in development and dysmorphogenesis
AU - Richtsmeier, Joan T.
AU - Flaherty, Kevin
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors take full responsibility for ideas and data presented in this manuscript. JTR thanks Drs. Kristina Aldridge and Ethylin Wang Jabs for discussions about craniosynos-tosis over the years that helped mold her view about these conditions. We thank Dr. Anne Buchanan for a critical evaluation of a previous version of this paper and two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to shape the final version. Drs. Susan Motch and Christopher Percival were instrumental in compiling information and data for Figs. 2 and 8. Human CT data from our image archive are maintained according to approved IRB protocols of the Pennsylvania State University. The work presented in this paper was supported in part by NIDCR/NIH R01DE018500, R01DE022988; NIDCR/NIH and ARRA 3R01DE018500-02S1; NSF BCS 0725227.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - The brain originates relatively early in development from differentiated ectoderm that forms a hollow tube and takes on an exceedingly complex shape with development. The skull is made up of individual bony elements that form from neural crest- and mesoderm-derived mesenchyme that unite to provide support and protection for soft tissues and spaces of the head. The meninges provide a protective and permeable membrane between brain and skull. Across evolutionary and developmental time, dynamic changes in brain and skull shape track one another so that their integration is evidenced in two structures that fit soundly regardless of changes in biomechanical and physiologic functions. Evidence for this tight correspondence is also seen in diseases of the craniofacial complex that are often classified as diseases of the skull (e.g., craniosynostosis) or diseases of the brain (e.g., holoprosencephaly) even when both tissues are affected. Our review suggests a model that links brain and skull morphogenesis through coordinated integration of signaling pathways (e.g., FGF, TGFβ, Wnt) via processes that are not currently understood, perhaps involving the meninges. Differences in the earliest signaling of biological structure establish divergent designs that will be enhanced during morphogenesis. Signaling systems that pattern the developing brain are also active in patterning required for growth and assembly of the skull and some members of these signaling families have been indicated as causal for craniofacial diseases. Because cells of early brain and skull are sensitive to similar signaling families, variation in the strength or timing of signals or shifts in patterning boundaries that affect one system (neural or skull) could also affect the other system and appropriate co-adjustments in development would be made. Interactions of these signaling systems and of the tissues that they pattern are fundamental to the consistent but labile functional and structural association of brain and skull conserved over evolutionary time obvious in the study of development and disease.
AB - The brain originates relatively early in development from differentiated ectoderm that forms a hollow tube and takes on an exceedingly complex shape with development. The skull is made up of individual bony elements that form from neural crest- and mesoderm-derived mesenchyme that unite to provide support and protection for soft tissues and spaces of the head. The meninges provide a protective and permeable membrane between brain and skull. Across evolutionary and developmental time, dynamic changes in brain and skull shape track one another so that their integration is evidenced in two structures that fit soundly regardless of changes in biomechanical and physiologic functions. Evidence for this tight correspondence is also seen in diseases of the craniofacial complex that are often classified as diseases of the skull (e.g., craniosynostosis) or diseases of the brain (e.g., holoprosencephaly) even when both tissues are affected. Our review suggests a model that links brain and skull morphogenesis through coordinated integration of signaling pathways (e.g., FGF, TGFβ, Wnt) via processes that are not currently understood, perhaps involving the meninges. Differences in the earliest signaling of biological structure establish divergent designs that will be enhanced during morphogenesis. Signaling systems that pattern the developing brain are also active in patterning required for growth and assembly of the skull and some members of these signaling families have been indicated as causal for craniofacial diseases. Because cells of early brain and skull are sensitive to similar signaling families, variation in the strength or timing of signals or shifts in patterning boundaries that affect one system (neural or skull) could also affect the other system and appropriate co-adjustments in development would be made. Interactions of these signaling systems and of the tissues that they pattern are fundamental to the consistent but labile functional and structural association of brain and skull conserved over evolutionary time obvious in the study of development and disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876693037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876693037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00401-013-1104-y
DO - 10.1007/s00401-013-1104-y
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23525521
AN - SCOPUS:84876693037
SN - 0001-6322
VL - 125
SP - 469
EP - 489
JO - Acta Neuropathologica
JF - Acta Neuropathologica
IS - 4
ER -