TY - JOUR
T1 - Harsh and Sweet Sensations Predict Acute Liking of Electronic Cigarettes, but Flavor Does Not Affect Acute Nicotine Intake
T2 - A Pilot Laboratory Study in Men
AU - Baker, Allison N.
AU - Bakke, Alyssa J.
AU - Branstetter, Steven A.
AU - Hayes, John E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by funds from the Pennsylvania State University, including the Sarah Chinn Kalser Faculty Research Assistance Endowment from the College of Agricultural Sciences, and a gift from James and Helen Zallie in support of Sensory Science. Dr. Hayes also receives support from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Federal Appropriations (Hatch Project No. PEN04708 and Accession No. 1019852). The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official US Government determination or policy.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Introduction: Electronic cigarette use is increasing in popularity, and thousands of flavors are available. Adolescent vaping rates in the United States have nearly doubled in the past year. Unlike combustible tobacco, added flavors are not currently regulated for some types of electronic cigarette products. Here, we investigated the role of flavor in electronic cigarette liking and acute intake. Methods: Men (n = 39) aged 18–45 vaped in a controlled laboratory setting after being randomized to one of four e-liquids: 6 mg nicotine/mL cherry, 18 mg/mL cherry, 6 mg/mL chocolate, or 18 mg/ mL chocolate. They completed several questionnaires, and vaped ad libitum for 10 minutes. After the first puff, participants rated sensations (sweetness, bitterness, coolness, harshness/irritation) on general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS) and rated overall liking on a generalized hedonic scale. Once the 10-minute session ended, participants made another set of ratings. Results: Liking was generally stable across the vaping session and liking varied substantially across the four conditions. Across all conditions, sensory ratings predicted liking: harshness/irritation was negatively associated with first puff liking, whereas perceived sweetness was positively associated with first puff liking. First puff liking associated with increased amount of e-liquid vaped, but not total nicotine intake. Participants appeared to titrate their nicotine intake regardless of assigned condition. Conclusion: Flavored e-liquids affect acute liking ratings, but not acute nicotine intake. Implications: These data suggest individuals who regularly vape may titrate their nicotine intake, regardless of flavor, and contrary to expectations, acute liking did not predict total nicotine intake. However, more-liked flavors may potentially make higher nicotine levels more tolerable by adding pleasant sensations directly, rather than by perceptual masking that reduces aversive sensations.
AB - Introduction: Electronic cigarette use is increasing in popularity, and thousands of flavors are available. Adolescent vaping rates in the United States have nearly doubled in the past year. Unlike combustible tobacco, added flavors are not currently regulated for some types of electronic cigarette products. Here, we investigated the role of flavor in electronic cigarette liking and acute intake. Methods: Men (n = 39) aged 18–45 vaped in a controlled laboratory setting after being randomized to one of four e-liquids: 6 mg nicotine/mL cherry, 18 mg/mL cherry, 6 mg/mL chocolate, or 18 mg/ mL chocolate. They completed several questionnaires, and vaped ad libitum for 10 minutes. After the first puff, participants rated sensations (sweetness, bitterness, coolness, harshness/irritation) on general labeled magnitude scales (gLMS) and rated overall liking on a generalized hedonic scale. Once the 10-minute session ended, participants made another set of ratings. Results: Liking was generally stable across the vaping session and liking varied substantially across the four conditions. Across all conditions, sensory ratings predicted liking: harshness/irritation was negatively associated with first puff liking, whereas perceived sweetness was positively associated with first puff liking. First puff liking associated with increased amount of e-liquid vaped, but not total nicotine intake. Participants appeared to titrate their nicotine intake regardless of assigned condition. Conclusion: Flavored e-liquids affect acute liking ratings, but not acute nicotine intake. Implications: These data suggest individuals who regularly vape may titrate their nicotine intake, regardless of flavor, and contrary to expectations, acute liking did not predict total nicotine intake. However, more-liked flavors may potentially make higher nicotine levels more tolerable by adding pleasant sensations directly, rather than by perceptual masking that reduces aversive sensations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101759553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101759553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntaa209
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntaa209
M3 - Article
C2 - 33047127
AN - SCOPUS:85101759553
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 23
SP - 687
EP - 693
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 4
ER -