TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneities in the infection process drive ranavirus transmission
AU - Brunner, Jesse L.
AU - Beaty, Lynne
AU - Guitard, Alexandra
AU - Russell, Deanna
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We wish to thank Keri VanCamp and Vassar College for allowing us to use the Priscilla Bullitt Collins Field Station and two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved this manuscript. This work was supported by NSF grant DEB 1139199 to J. L. Brunner. These experiments with animals were approved by SUNY-ESF's IACUC.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Transmission is central to our understanding and efforts to control the spread of infectious diseases. Because transmission generally requires close contact, host movements and behaviors can shape transmission dynamics: random and complete mixing leads to the classic density-dependent model, but if hosts primarily interact locally (e.g., aggregate) or within groups, transmission may saturate. Manipulating host behavior may thus change both the rate and functional form of transmission. We used the ranavirus-wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpole system to test whether transmission rates reflect contacts, and whether the functional form of transmission can be influenced by the distribution of food in mesocosms (widely dispersed, promoting random movement and mixing vs. a central pile, promoting aggregations). Contact rates increased with density, as expected, but transmission rapidly saturated. Observed rates of transmission were not explained by observed contact rates or the density-dependent model, but instead transmission in both treatments followed models allowing for heterogeneities in the transmission process. We argue that contacts were not generally limiting, but instead that our results are better explained by heterogeneities in host susceptibility. Moreover, manipulating host behavior to manage the spread of infectious disease may prove difficult to implement.
AB - Transmission is central to our understanding and efforts to control the spread of infectious diseases. Because transmission generally requires close contact, host movements and behaviors can shape transmission dynamics: random and complete mixing leads to the classic density-dependent model, but if hosts primarily interact locally (e.g., aggregate) or within groups, transmission may saturate. Manipulating host behavior may thus change both the rate and functional form of transmission. We used the ranavirus-wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpole system to test whether transmission rates reflect contacts, and whether the functional form of transmission can be influenced by the distribution of food in mesocosms (widely dispersed, promoting random movement and mixing vs. a central pile, promoting aggregations). Contact rates increased with density, as expected, but transmission rapidly saturated. Observed rates of transmission were not explained by observed contact rates or the density-dependent model, but instead transmission in both treatments followed models allowing for heterogeneities in the transmission process. We argue that contacts were not generally limiting, but instead that our results are better explained by heterogeneities in host susceptibility. Moreover, manipulating host behavior to manage the spread of infectious disease may prove difficult to implement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010425166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010425166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecy.1644
DO - 10.1002/ecy.1644
M3 - Article
C2 - 27859036
AN - SCOPUS:85010425166
SN - 0012-9658
VL - 98
SP - 576
EP - 582
JO - Ecology
JF - Ecology
IS - 2
ER -