TY - JOUR
T1 - High dose rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
AU - Doyle, Laura A.
AU - Yamoah, Kosj
AU - Andrel, Jocelyn A.
AU - Trabulsi, Edouard J.
AU - Hurwitz, Mark D.
AU - Dicker, Adam P.
AU - Den, Robert B.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Studies of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) have shown excellent rates of tumor control and cancer specific survival. Moreover, LDR-BT combined with EBRT (i.e. "LDR-BT boost") is hypothesized to improve local control. While phase II trials with LDR-BT boost have produced mature data of outcomes and toxicities, high dose rate (HDR)-BT has been growing in popularity as an alternative boost therapy. Boost from HDR-BT has theoretical advantages over LDR-BT, including improved cancer cell death and better dose distribution from customization of catheter dwell times, locations, and inverse dose optimization. Freedom from biochemical failure rates at five years for low-, intermediate-, high-risk, and locally advanced patients have generally been 85-100%, 80-98%, 59-96%, and 34-85%, respectively. Late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3-4 toxicities have also been encouraging with <6% of patients experiencing any toxicity. Limitations of current HDR-BT boost studies include reports of only single-institution experiences, and unrefined reports of toxicity or patient quality of life. Comparative effectiveness research will help guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment option for individual patients based on risk-stratification, expected outcomes, toxicities, quality of life, and cost.
AB - Studies of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) have shown excellent rates of tumor control and cancer specific survival. Moreover, LDR-BT combined with EBRT (i.e. "LDR-BT boost") is hypothesized to improve local control. While phase II trials with LDR-BT boost have produced mature data of outcomes and toxicities, high dose rate (HDR)-BT has been growing in popularity as an alternative boost therapy. Boost from HDR-BT has theoretical advantages over LDR-BT, including improved cancer cell death and better dose distribution from customization of catheter dwell times, locations, and inverse dose optimization. Freedom from biochemical failure rates at five years for low-, intermediate-, high-risk, and locally advanced patients have generally been 85-100%, 80-98%, 59-96%, and 34-85%, respectively. Late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3-4 toxicities have also been encouraging with <6% of patients experiencing any toxicity. Limitations of current HDR-BT boost studies include reports of only single-institution experiences, and unrefined reports of toxicity or patient quality of life. Comparative effectiveness research will help guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment option for individual patients based on risk-stratification, expected outcomes, toxicities, quality of life, and cost.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892857318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892857318&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.10.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24231548
AN - SCOPUS:84892857318
SN - 0305-7372
VL - 40
SP - 414
EP - 425
JO - Cancer Treatment Reviews
JF - Cancer Treatment Reviews
IS - 3
ER -