TY - JOUR
T1 - High speed railway track dynamic behavior near critical speed
AU - Gao, Yin
AU - Huang, Hai
AU - Ho, Carlton L.
AU - Hyslip, James P.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Cameron Stuart and the financial support from Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) program ( DTFR53-12-C-00029 ). The authors very much appreciate the support of Steve Chrismer and Mike Trosino from Amtrak for the field testing and monitoring. Also, the authors wish to thank to the support and work from Pennsylvania State University, HyGround Engineering and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - This study was performed on the Amtrak Northeast Corridor (NEC) at Kingston, Rhode Island where is known as the Great Swamp and requires more frequent track maintenance. It was suspected that the so-called “critical speed” condition might exist at this particular location. The critical speed is the speed at which trains travel on the soft subgrade close to or higher than the Rayleigh wave velocity of the subgrade soil. The conventional understanding of the “critical speed” would expect both a cone-shaped ground wave motion and substantial amount of track deflections. Field investigations combined with a validated 3-D dynamic track-subgrade interaction model were used to evaluate the track performance and determine if the critical speed effect exists at the Kingston site. The track performance was investigated by a three-by-three (3 × 3) array of accelerometers. Site investigations were carried out to characterize the site and provide input data for modeling. According to the field measurements and model results, the rail did not show excessive deflections; however, ground surface wave propagation had been detected with a cone-shaped mode. In other words, the cone-shaped ground wave motion and the increase in rail deflection did not occur at the same time as the conventional understanding. In addition, the model results pointed out that the stress level in the subgrade would encounter a significant increase under the current operational speeds (less than 250 km/h) rather than excessive rail deflections and the rail deflections will increase dramatically at the simulated train speeds of over 300 km/h. Therefore, the “critical speed” is defined in two levels for the Kingston site: 1) The speed causing significant stress increase in the ballast and subgrade, at which more frequent ballast maintenance is needed; 2) The speed causing significant increase in rail deflection, at which derailment becomes a concern.
AB - This study was performed on the Amtrak Northeast Corridor (NEC) at Kingston, Rhode Island where is known as the Great Swamp and requires more frequent track maintenance. It was suspected that the so-called “critical speed” condition might exist at this particular location. The critical speed is the speed at which trains travel on the soft subgrade close to or higher than the Rayleigh wave velocity of the subgrade soil. The conventional understanding of the “critical speed” would expect both a cone-shaped ground wave motion and substantial amount of track deflections. Field investigations combined with a validated 3-D dynamic track-subgrade interaction model were used to evaluate the track performance and determine if the critical speed effect exists at the Kingston site. The track performance was investigated by a three-by-three (3 × 3) array of accelerometers. Site investigations were carried out to characterize the site and provide input data for modeling. According to the field measurements and model results, the rail did not show excessive deflections; however, ground surface wave propagation had been detected with a cone-shaped mode. In other words, the cone-shaped ground wave motion and the increase in rail deflection did not occur at the same time as the conventional understanding. In addition, the model results pointed out that the stress level in the subgrade would encounter a significant increase under the current operational speeds (less than 250 km/h) rather than excessive rail deflections and the rail deflections will increase dramatically at the simulated train speeds of over 300 km/h. Therefore, the “critical speed” is defined in two levels for the Kingston site: 1) The speed causing significant stress increase in the ballast and subgrade, at which more frequent ballast maintenance is needed; 2) The speed causing significant increase in rail deflection, at which derailment becomes a concern.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028320374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028320374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028320374
SN - 0267-7261
VL - 101
SP - 285
EP - 294
JO - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
ER -