TY - JOUR
T1 - Hold the phone
T2 - Assessing the rights of wireless handset owners and carriers
AU - Frieden, Rob
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Most subscribers in the United States acquire a subsidized handset when they activate or renew wireless telephone service. In exchange for purchasing a handset below cost, these customers must commit to a two-year service term with substantial financial penalties for early termination, and they must accept carrier-imposed limitations on the use of their handsets. Wireless carriers typically lock subscriber access to one carrier and lock out or thwart unaffiliated providers from providing content, software, and applications to these handsets.Limitations on the use of wireless handsets juxtaposes with the Carter/one policy established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) forty years ago, which requires all telephone companies to allow subscribers to attach any technically compatible device. Consumers take for granted the right to attach any device to a network that is "privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental."1 Only recently have some wireless subscribers come to understand the costs of not having complete freedom to use their handsets. Technically sophisticated users have resorted to "self-help" strategies to override carrier locks at the risk of permanently disabling ("bricking") the handset.
AB - Most subscribers in the United States acquire a subsidized handset when they activate or renew wireless telephone service. In exchange for purchasing a handset below cost, these customers must commit to a two-year service term with substantial financial penalties for early termination, and they must accept carrier-imposed limitations on the use of their handsets. Wireless carriers typically lock subscriber access to one carrier and lock out or thwart unaffiliated providers from providing content, software, and applications to these handsets.Limitations on the use of wireless handsets juxtaposes with the Carter/one policy established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) forty years ago, which requires all telephone companies to allow subscribers to attach any technically compatible device. Consumers take for granted the right to attach any device to a network that is "privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental."1 Only recently have some wireless subscribers come to understand the costs of not having complete freedom to use their handsets. Technically sophisticated users have resorted to "self-help" strategies to override carrier locks at the risk of permanently disabling ("bricking") the handset.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61449218812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61449218812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5195/LAWREVIEW.2008.97
DO - 10.5195/LAWREVIEW.2008.97
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:61449218812
SN - 0041-9915
VL - 69
SP - 675
EP - 726
JO - University of Pittsburgh Law Review
JF - University of Pittsburgh Law Review
IS - 4
ER -