TY - JOUR
T1 - Homeownership and taxes
T2 - How the TCJA altered the tax code's treatment of housing
AU - Ambrose, Brent W.
AU - Hendershott, Patric H.
AU - Ling, David C.
AU - McGill, Gary A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Real Estate Economics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - The federal government has long promoted homeownership through various provisions in the US income tax code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) renewed interest and debate about the treatment of housing via the tax code, particularly with respect to the mortgage interest deduction and the limitation on deductions for state and local taxes. We document the extent that the TCJA magnifies the long-standing unequal treatment of debt and equity financing of homeownership in the tax code. Our analysis indicates that most households no longer benefit from mortgage interest and property tax deductions. We also show how the limitations on the deduction of state and local taxes alter the costs associated with homeownership across geographic areas, and we provide detailed calculations of the average and marginal tax rates at which housing-related expenses are deducted. The former are relevant to the tenure choice decision, the latter to the quantity demanded decision. Finally, we document that the lost tax savings associated with the inability to benefit from mortgage interest and property tax expenditures are often small relative to the primary tax benefit owners still enjoy: the nontaxation of the return on equity invested in the home.
AB - The federal government has long promoted homeownership through various provisions in the US income tax code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) renewed interest and debate about the treatment of housing via the tax code, particularly with respect to the mortgage interest deduction and the limitation on deductions for state and local taxes. We document the extent that the TCJA magnifies the long-standing unequal treatment of debt and equity financing of homeownership in the tax code. Our analysis indicates that most households no longer benefit from mortgage interest and property tax deductions. We also show how the limitations on the deduction of state and local taxes alter the costs associated with homeownership across geographic areas, and we provide detailed calculations of the average and marginal tax rates at which housing-related expenses are deducted. The former are relevant to the tenure choice decision, the latter to the quantity demanded decision. Finally, we document that the lost tax savings associated with the inability to benefit from mortgage interest and property tax expenditures are often small relative to the primary tax benefit owners still enjoy: the nontaxation of the return on equity invested in the home.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124907559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124907559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1540-6229.12374
DO - 10.1111/1540-6229.12374
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124907559
SN - 1080-8620
VL - 50
SP - 1167
EP - 1200
JO - Real Estate Economics
JF - Real Estate Economics
IS - 5
ER -