Honor-endorsing women and relational aggression: Evidence for the presence of feminine aggression norms in southern U.S. women

Stephen Foster, Jarrod E. Bock, Mauricio Carvallo, Callie L. Pollet, William Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research on honor cultures has centered almost exclusively on men and men's use of physical aggression as a means of reputation defense, while tacitly overlooking women's role(s). Across three studies (N = 813), we examined whether honor endorsing women, like men, exhibit aggressive tendencies, albeit in the form of relational aggression. We found that women's honor endorsement predicted greater use of reactive relational aggression (e.g., ignoring and excluding others; Studies 1 and 2), but only among women who felt they were not achieving what it means to be an honorable woman (Study 2). Lastly, we found that women higher in feminine honor endorsement were more supportive of women who relationally aggressed (i.e. spreading rumors, social exclusion) in response to reputation threats (Study 3). Taken together, the present research indicates that honor endorsing women are more active in reputation maintenance and defense than prior work has acknowledged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number111668
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume194
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Honor-endorsing women and relational aggression: Evidence for the presence of feminine aggression norms in southern U.S. women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this