TY - JOUR
T1 - Hospice care in assisted living facilities versus at home
T2 - Results of a multisite cohort study
AU - Dougherty, Meredith
AU - Harris, Pamela S.
AU - Teno, Joan
AU - Corcoran, Amy M.
AU - Douglas, Cindy
AU - Nelson, Jackie
AU - Way, Deborah
AU - Harrold, Joan E.
AU - Casarett, David J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Objectives To compare residents of assisted living facilities receiving hospice with people receiving hospice care at home. Design Electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study. Setting Nonprofit hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness network. Participants Individuals admitted to hospice between January 1, 2008, and May 15, 2012 (N = 85,581; 7,451 (8.7%) assisted living facility, 78,130 (91.3%) home). Measurements Hospice length of stay, use of opioids for pain, and site of death. Results The assisted living population was more likely than the home hospice population to have a diagnosis of dementia (23.5% vs 4.7%; odds ratio (OR) = 13.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.3-14.4; P <.001) and enroll in hospice closer to death (median length of stay 24 vs 29 days). Assisted living residents were less likely to receive opioids for pain (18.1% vs 39.7%; OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.29-0.39, P <.001) and less likely to die in an inpatient hospice unit (9.3% vs 16.1%; OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.49-0.58, P <.001) or a hospital (1.3% vs 7.6%; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.13-0.19, P <.001). Conclusion Three are several differences between residents of assisted living receiving hospice care and individuals living at home receiving hospice care. A better understanding of these differences could allow hospices to develop guidelines for better coordination of end-of-life care for the assisted living population.
AB - Objectives To compare residents of assisted living facilities receiving hospice with people receiving hospice care at home. Design Electronic health record-based retrospective cohort study. Setting Nonprofit hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organized to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness network. Participants Individuals admitted to hospice between January 1, 2008, and May 15, 2012 (N = 85,581; 7,451 (8.7%) assisted living facility, 78,130 (91.3%) home). Measurements Hospice length of stay, use of opioids for pain, and site of death. Results The assisted living population was more likely than the home hospice population to have a diagnosis of dementia (23.5% vs 4.7%; odds ratio (OR) = 13.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.3-14.4; P <.001) and enroll in hospice closer to death (median length of stay 24 vs 29 days). Assisted living residents were less likely to receive opioids for pain (18.1% vs 39.7%; OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.29-0.39, P <.001) and less likely to die in an inpatient hospice unit (9.3% vs 16.1%; OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.49-0.58, P <.001) or a hospital (1.3% vs 7.6%; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.13-0.19, P <.001). Conclusion Three are several differences between residents of assisted living receiving hospice care and individuals living at home receiving hospice care. A better understanding of these differences could allow hospices to develop guidelines for better coordination of end-of-life care for the assisted living population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931340232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931340232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgs.13429
DO - 10.1111/jgs.13429
M3 - Article
C2 - 26096389
AN - SCOPUS:84931340232
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 63
SP - 1153
EP - 1157
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 6
ER -