TY - JOUR
T1 - HOx budgets in a deciduous forest
T2 - Results from the PROPHET summer 1998 campaign
AU - Tan, D.
AU - Faloona, I.
AU - Simpas, J. B.
AU - Brune, W.
AU - Shepson, P. B.
AU - Couch, T. L.
AU - Sumner, A. L.
AU - Carroll, M. A.
AU - Thornberry, T.
AU - Apel, E.
AU - Riemer, D.
AU - Stockwell, W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2001 by the American Geophysical Union.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Results from a tightly constrained photochemical point model for OH and HO2 are compared to OH and HO2 data collected during the Program for Research on Oxidants: Photochemistry, Emissions, and Transport (PROPHET) summer 1998 intensive campaign held in northern Michigan. The PROPHET campaign was located in a deciduous forest marked by relatively low NOx levels and high isoprene emissions. Detailed HOx budgets are presented. The model is generally unable to match the measured OH, with the observations 2.7 times greater than the model on average. The model HO2, however, is in good agreement with the measured HO2. Even with an additional postulated OH source from the ozonolysis of unmeasured terpenes, the measured OH is 1.5 times greater than the model; the model HO2 with this added source is 15% to 30% higher than the measured HO2. Moreover, the HO2/OH ratios as modeled are 2.5 to 4 times higher than the measured ratios, indicating that the cycling between OH and HO2 is poorly described by the model. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancies.
AB - Results from a tightly constrained photochemical point model for OH and HO2 are compared to OH and HO2 data collected during the Program for Research on Oxidants: Photochemistry, Emissions, and Transport (PROPHET) summer 1998 intensive campaign held in northern Michigan. The PROPHET campaign was located in a deciduous forest marked by relatively low NOx levels and high isoprene emissions. Detailed HOx budgets are presented. The model is generally unable to match the measured OH, with the observations 2.7 times greater than the model on average. The model HO2, however, is in good agreement with the measured HO2. Even with an additional postulated OH source from the ozonolysis of unmeasured terpenes, the measured OH is 1.5 times greater than the model; the model HO2 with this added source is 15% to 30% higher than the measured HO2. Moreover, the HO2/OH ratios as modeled are 2.5 to 4 times higher than the measured ratios, indicating that the cycling between OH and HO2 is poorly described by the model. We discuss possible reasons for the discrepancies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035202298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035202298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2000JD000175
DO - 10.1029/2000JD000175
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035202298
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 106
SP - 24407
EP - 24427
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - D20
ER -