TY - JOUR
T1 - Household Air Pollution Interventions to Improve Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement
AU - on behalf of the American Thoracic Society Assembly on Environmental, Occupational, and Population Health
AU - Balmes, John M.D.
AU - Checkley, William
AU - Lai, Peggy S.
AU - Lam, Nicholas L.
AU - Ozoh, Obianuju B.
AU - Adair-Rohani, Heather
AU - Alexander, Donee
AU - Balakrishnan, Kalpana
AU - Bisaga, Iwona
AU - Boyer, Savanna
AU - Chafe, Zoe A.
AU - Clasen, Thomas
AU - Diaz-Artiga, Anaite
AU - Gallery, Bill
AU - Grieshop, Andrew
AU - Harmon, John
AU - Harrison, Kat
AU - Hartinger, Stella M.
AU - Jack, Darby
AU - Kaali, Seyram
AU - Lee, Alison G.
AU - Lydston, Melissa
AU - Mortimer, Kevin M.
AU - Nicolaou, Laura
AU - Obonyo, Esther
AU - Okello, Gabriel
AU - Olopade, Christopher
AU - Pillarisetti, Ajay
AU - Pinto, Alisha Noella
AU - Rosenthal, Joshua P.
AU - Schluger, Neil
AU - Shi, Xiaoming
AU - Thompson, Claudia
AU - Thompson, Lisa M.
AU - Volckens, John
AU - Williams, Kendra N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 by the American Thoracic Society.
PY - 2024/4/15
Y1 - 2024/4/15
N2 - Background: An estimated 3 billion people, largely in low- and middle-income countries, rely on unclean fuels for cooking, heating, and lighting to meet household energy needs. The resulting exposure to household air pollution (HAP) is a leading cause of pneumonia, chronic lung disease, and other adverse health effects. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials of clean cooking interventions to reduce HAP have been conducted. We aim to provide guidance on how to interpret the findings of these trials and how they should inform policy makers and practitioners. Methods: We assembled a multidisciplinary working group of international researchers, public health practitioners, and policymakers with expertise in household air pollution from within academia, the American Thoracic Society, funders, nongovernmental organizations, and global organizations, including the World Bank and the World Health Organization. We performed a literature search, convened four sessions via web conference, and developed consensus conclusions and recommendations via the Delphi method. Results: The committee reached consensus on 14 conclusions and recommendations. Although some trials using cleaner-burning biomass stoves or cleaner-cooking fuels have reduced HAP exposure, the committee was divided (with 55% saying no and 45% saying yes) on whether the studied interventions improved measured health outcomes. Conclusions: HAP is associated with adverse health effects in observational studies. However, it remains unclear which household energy interventions reduce exposure, improve health, can be scaled, and are sustainable. Researchers should engage with policy makers and practitioners working to scale cleaner energy solutions to understand and address their information needs.
AB - Background: An estimated 3 billion people, largely in low- and middle-income countries, rely on unclean fuels for cooking, heating, and lighting to meet household energy needs. The resulting exposure to household air pollution (HAP) is a leading cause of pneumonia, chronic lung disease, and other adverse health effects. In the last decade, randomized controlled trials of clean cooking interventions to reduce HAP have been conducted. We aim to provide guidance on how to interpret the findings of these trials and how they should inform policy makers and practitioners. Methods: We assembled a multidisciplinary working group of international researchers, public health practitioners, and policymakers with expertise in household air pollution from within academia, the American Thoracic Society, funders, nongovernmental organizations, and global organizations, including the World Bank and the World Health Organization. We performed a literature search, convened four sessions via web conference, and developed consensus conclusions and recommendations via the Delphi method. Results: The committee reached consensus on 14 conclusions and recommendations. Although some trials using cleaner-burning biomass stoves or cleaner-cooking fuels have reduced HAP exposure, the committee was divided (with 55% saying no and 45% saying yes) on whether the studied interventions improved measured health outcomes. Conclusions: HAP is associated with adverse health effects in observational studies. However, it remains unclear which household energy interventions reduce exposure, improve health, can be scaled, and are sustainable. Researchers should engage with policy makers and practitioners working to scale cleaner energy solutions to understand and address their information needs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190901600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190901600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.202402-0398ST
DO - 10.1164/rccm.202402-0398ST
M3 - Article
C2 - 38619436
AN - SCOPUS:85190901600
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 209
SP - 909
EP - 927
JO - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
JF - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
IS - 8
ER -