TY - JOUR
T1 - How chromosomal inversions reorient the evolutionary process
AU - Berdan, Emma L.
AU - Barton, Nicholas H.
AU - Butlin, Roger
AU - Charlesworth, Brian
AU - Faria, Rui
AU - Fragata, Inês
AU - Gilbert, Kimberly J.
AU - Jay, Paul
AU - Kapun, Martin
AU - Lotterhos, Katie E.
AU - Mérot, Claire
AU - Durmaz Mitchell, Esra
AU - Pascual, Marta
AU - Peichel, Catherine L.
AU - Rafajlović, Marina
AU - Westram, Anja M.
AU - Schaeffer, Stephen W.
AU - Johannesson, Kerstin
AU - Flatt, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Inversions are structural mutations that reverse the sequence of a chromosome segment and reduce the effective rate of recombination in the heterozygous state. They play a major role in adaptation, as well as in other evolutionary processes such as speciation. Although inversions have been studied since the 1920s, they remain difficult to investigate because the reduced recombination conferred by them strengthens the effects of drift and hitchhiking, which in turn can obscure signatures of selection. Nonetheless, numerous inversions have been found to be under selection. Given recent advances in population genetic theory and empirical study, here we review how different mechanisms of selection affect the evolution of inversions. A key difference between inversions and other mutations, such as single nucleotide variants, is that the fitness of an inversion may be affected by a larger number of frequently interacting processes. This considerably complicates the analysis of the causes underlying the evolution of inversions. We discuss the extent to which these mechanisms can be disentangled, and by which approach.
AB - Inversions are structural mutations that reverse the sequence of a chromosome segment and reduce the effective rate of recombination in the heterozygous state. They play a major role in adaptation, as well as in other evolutionary processes such as speciation. Although inversions have been studied since the 1920s, they remain difficult to investigate because the reduced recombination conferred by them strengthens the effects of drift and hitchhiking, which in turn can obscure signatures of selection. Nonetheless, numerous inversions have been found to be under selection. Given recent advances in population genetic theory and empirical study, here we review how different mechanisms of selection affect the evolution of inversions. A key difference between inversions and other mutations, such as single nucleotide variants, is that the fitness of an inversion may be affected by a larger number of frequently interacting processes. This considerably complicates the analysis of the causes underlying the evolution of inversions. We discuss the extent to which these mechanisms can be disentangled, and by which approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176211047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176211047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jeb.14242
DO - 10.1111/jeb.14242
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37942504
AN - SCOPUS:85176211047
SN - 1010-061X
VL - 36
SP - 1761
EP - 1782
JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology
JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology
IS - 12
ER -