Abstract
Complexity of communication is one of the important factors that distinguishes multi-lateral negotiation from its bilateral cousin. We investigate how the communication configuration affects a three-person coalition negotiation. Restricting who can communicate with whom strongly influences outcomes, and not always in ways that current theory anticipates. Competitive frictions, including a tendency to communicate offers privately, appear to shape much of what we observe. Our results suggest that parties with weaker alternatives would benefit from a more constrained structure, especially if they can be the conduit of communication, while those endowed with stronger alternatives would do well to work within a more public communication structure that promotes competitive bidding.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 583-598 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Management Science |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2003 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research