Abstract
Complexity of communication is one of the important factors that distinguishes multi-lateral negotiation from its bilateral cousin. We investigate how the communication configuration affects a three-person coalition negotiation. Restricting who can communicate with whom strongly influences outcomes, and not always in ways that current theory anticipates. Competitive frictions, including a tendency to communicate offers privately, appear to shape much of what we observe. Our results suggest that parties with weaker alternatives would benefit from a more constrained structure, especially if they can be the conduit of communication, while those endowed with stronger alternatives would do well to work within a more public communication structure that promotes competitive bidding.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 583-598 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Management Science |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2003 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How communication links influence coalition bargaining: A laboratory investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver