TY - JOUR
T1 - How lack of knowledge on emissions and psychological biases deter consumers from taking effective action to mitigate climate change
AU - Winterich, Karen Page
AU - Reczek, Rebecca Walker
AU - Makov, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Academy of Marketing Science 2023.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - In this research, we document knowledge gaps between consumers and experts about what consumer actions most effectively help mitigate climate change. We then identify three sources for lack of consumer knowledge on greenhouse gas emissions associated with consumption: carbon emissions labeling, awareness of indirect versus direct emissions, and orders of magnitude differences in carbon intensity across behaviors. We further propose that this lack of knowledge and several cognitive and motivational biases lead consumers away from effective climate actions, including the tendency to focus on first- versus second-order effects of “green” behaviors, motivated reasoning that easier, more accessible actions are more impactful, and a focus on individual behavior versus systemic changes. We close with a research agenda designed to address the lack of knowledge and biases we identify, while acknowledging that shifting marketers and consumers to focus on systemic changes may be both most challenging and most impactful.
AB - In this research, we document knowledge gaps between consumers and experts about what consumer actions most effectively help mitigate climate change. We then identify three sources for lack of consumer knowledge on greenhouse gas emissions associated with consumption: carbon emissions labeling, awareness of indirect versus direct emissions, and orders of magnitude differences in carbon intensity across behaviors. We further propose that this lack of knowledge and several cognitive and motivational biases lead consumers away from effective climate actions, including the tendency to focus on first- versus second-order effects of “green” behaviors, motivated reasoning that easier, more accessible actions are more impactful, and a focus on individual behavior versus systemic changes. We close with a research agenda designed to address the lack of knowledge and biases we identify, while acknowledging that shifting marketers and consumers to focus on systemic changes may be both most challenging and most impactful.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174627689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174627689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11747-023-00981-z
DO - 10.1007/s11747-023-00981-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174627689
SN - 0092-0703
VL - 52
SP - 1475
EP - 1494
JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
IS - 5
ER -