TY - JOUR
T1 - How rational thinking style affects sales promotion effectiveness
AU - Yang, Bi
AU - Mattila, Anna S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Marriott Foundation for the funding of this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Despite the widespread use of “buy one get one free” (BOGOF) and “multi-unit price” (MUP, e.g., buy two get 50% off, 2 for $Y/2) promotions in the hospitality industry, no prior research has compared their effectiveness. The current study examines consumers’ purchase intention as a function of (a) BOGOF vs. MUP promotions and (b) rational thinking style, which reflects the level of capability and enjoyment of thinking analytically and logically. The results indicate that people low in rational thinking style exhibited a higher purchase intention toward BOGOF (vs. MUP) promotions while their counterparts high in rational thinking style were indifferent across the two promotion types. Further, this study identifies an important boundary condition. When the amount of savings (e.g., buy 2, save $Y/2) is salient in the MUP promotion, consumers low in rational thinking style are equally attracted to both types of offers. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
AB - Despite the widespread use of “buy one get one free” (BOGOF) and “multi-unit price” (MUP, e.g., buy two get 50% off, 2 for $Y/2) promotions in the hospitality industry, no prior research has compared their effectiveness. The current study examines consumers’ purchase intention as a function of (a) BOGOF vs. MUP promotions and (b) rational thinking style, which reflects the level of capability and enjoyment of thinking analytically and logically. The results indicate that people low in rational thinking style exhibited a higher purchase intention toward BOGOF (vs. MUP) promotions while their counterparts high in rational thinking style were indifferent across the two promotion types. Further, this study identifies an important boundary condition. When the amount of savings (e.g., buy 2, save $Y/2) is salient in the MUP promotion, consumers low in rational thinking style are equally attracted to both types of offers. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070731391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070731391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102335
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102335
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070731391
SN - 0278-4319
VL - 84
JO - International Journal of Hospitality Management
JF - International Journal of Hospitality Management
M1 - 102335
ER -