TY - JOUR
T1 - How repeated exposure to persuasive messaging shapes message responses over time
T2 - a longitudinal experiment
AU - Skurka, Chris
AU - Keating, David M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Repeated exposure theories have articulated several processes that explain how message repetition shapes persuasion over time, yet these processes are often studied in isolation. Moreover, repeated exposure theories have largely failed to specify the temporal trajectories of negative message responses over time. Integrating theorizing on repeated exposure, psychological reactance, and message fatigue, we conducted a mixed-design experiment (N = 1,416 total observations), varying the amount of daily exposure audiences had to campaign advertisements about distracted driving over nearly 2 weeks. Exposure to these messages (compared to control messages) led to greater message elaboration and reactance but not fatigue or attitudes. We found no evidence that these message reactions shifted linearly, logarithmically, or quadratically over time, with the exception that anger increased linearly with subsequent exposures. These findings suggest constraints on predictions made by repeated exposure frameworks, and post hoc analyses underscore the need to distinguish fatigue’s two dimensions conceptually and operationally.
AB - Repeated exposure theories have articulated several processes that explain how message repetition shapes persuasion over time, yet these processes are often studied in isolation. Moreover, repeated exposure theories have largely failed to specify the temporal trajectories of negative message responses over time. Integrating theorizing on repeated exposure, psychological reactance, and message fatigue, we conducted a mixed-design experiment (N = 1,416 total observations), varying the amount of daily exposure audiences had to campaign advertisements about distracted driving over nearly 2 weeks. Exposure to these messages (compared to control messages) led to greater message elaboration and reactance but not fatigue or attitudes. We found no evidence that these message reactions shifted linearly, logarithmically, or quadratically over time, with the exception that anger increased linearly with subsequent exposures. These findings suggest constraints on predictions made by repeated exposure frameworks, and post hoc analyses underscore the need to distinguish fatigue’s two dimensions conceptually and operationally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205696141&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205696141&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/hcr/hqae008
DO - 10.1093/hcr/hqae008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205696141
SN - 0360-3989
VL - 50
SP - 518
EP - 529
JO - Human Communication Research
JF - Human Communication Research
IS - 4
ER -