How to appraise the effectiveness of treatment

Suzanne B. Stewart, Phillip Dahm, Charles D. Scales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Advances in treatment and disease prevention occur frequently in urology. Urologists must identify a framework within which to evaluate these therapeutic innovations. Materials and Methods: The evidence-based approach to critical appraisal is described using an example from the urological literature. A three-part assessment of the trial validity, treatment effect, and applicability of results will permit the urologist to critically incorporate medical and surgical advances into practice. Results: Validity of clinical trials hinges upon balancing patient prognosis at the initiation, execution, and conclusion of the trial. Readers should be aware of not only the magnitude of the estimated treatment effect, but also its precision. Finally, urologists should consider all patient-important outcomes as well as the balance of potential benefits, harms, and costs, and patient values and preferences when making treatment decisions. Conclusion: Use of this framework for critical appraisal will lead to a more evidence-based application of new therapies for patients. Incorporation of a more evidence-based practice within urology will lead to an increase in the quality of patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-531
Number of pages7
JournalIndian Journal of Urology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'How to appraise the effectiveness of treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this