Abstract
There is almost no theoretical discussion of non-human animal well-being in the philosophical literature on well-being. To begin to rectify this, I develop a desire satisfaction theory of well-being for animals. I contrast this theory with my desire theory of well-being for humans, according to which a human benefits from satisfying desires for which she can offer reasons. I consider objections. The most important are (1) Eden Lin's claim that the correct theory of well-being cannot vary across different welfare subjects and (2) his objection against theories of human well-being that require exercising a sophisticated capacity such as reason giving.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 393-412 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Human and Animal Well-Being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver