TY - JOUR
T1 - Human-Caused Sound Distractors and their Impact on Operating Room Team Function
AU - Brommelsiek, Margaret
AU - Krishnan, Tara
AU - Rudy, Paul
AU - Viswanathan, Navin
AU - Sutkin, Gary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Background: Patient safety in the Operating Room (OR) depends on unobstructed team communication. Yet the typical OR is loud, containing numerous sounds from surgical machinery overlayed with human-caused sounds. Our objective was to compare machine vs human-caused sounds for their loudness and distraction, and potential impact on team communication. Methods: After surveying OR staff about sounds that interfere with job performance and team communication, we recorded 19 machine and 48 human-caused sounds measuring their acoustical intensity. We compared peak measures of machine vs human-caused sound loudness, using Student’s t-test. We observed the effect of these sounds on OR staff in 59 live surgeries, rating level of interference with team function. We visually depicted competing sounds through a spectral analysis. Results: The survey response rate was 62.8%. 93% of respondents indicated that OR noise, especially human-caused sounds such as irrelevant conversations, interfere with team communication, hearing, and focus. OR peak decibel levels ranged from 56.8 dB (surgical packaging) to 105.0 dB (kicked metal stepstool). Human-caused sounds were comparable to machine-caused sounds in terms of mean peak dB levels (77.0 versus 73.8 dB, p = 0.32), yet were rated as more interfering with surgical team function. The spectral analysis illustrated both machine and human-caused sound sources obscuring the surgeon’s instructions. Conclusions: Avoidable human-caused sounds are a major source of disruption in the OR and interfere with communication and job performance. We recommend surgical team training to minimize these distractions.
AB - Background: Patient safety in the Operating Room (OR) depends on unobstructed team communication. Yet the typical OR is loud, containing numerous sounds from surgical machinery overlayed with human-caused sounds. Our objective was to compare machine vs human-caused sounds for their loudness and distraction, and potential impact on team communication. Methods: After surveying OR staff about sounds that interfere with job performance and team communication, we recorded 19 machine and 48 human-caused sounds measuring their acoustical intensity. We compared peak measures of machine vs human-caused sound loudness, using Student’s t-test. We observed the effect of these sounds on OR staff in 59 live surgeries, rating level of interference with team function. We visually depicted competing sounds through a spectral analysis. Results: The survey response rate was 62.8%. 93% of respondents indicated that OR noise, especially human-caused sounds such as irrelevant conversations, interfere with team communication, hearing, and focus. OR peak decibel levels ranged from 56.8 dB (surgical packaging) to 105.0 dB (kicked metal stepstool). Human-caused sounds were comparable to machine-caused sounds in terms of mean peak dB levels (77.0 versus 73.8 dB, p = 0.32), yet were rated as more interfering with surgical team function. The spectral analysis illustrated both machine and human-caused sound sources obscuring the surgeon’s instructions. Conclusions: Avoidable human-caused sounds are a major source of disruption in the OR and interfere with communication and job performance. We recommend surgical team training to minimize these distractions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127256430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127256430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-022-06526-9
DO - 10.1007/s00268-022-06526-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 35347392
AN - SCOPUS:85127256430
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 46
SP - 1376
EP - 1382
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -