TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrodiplomacy and adaptive governance at the U.S.-Mexico border
T2 - 75 years of tradition and innovation in transboundary water management
AU - Wilder, Margaret O.
AU - Varady, Robert G.
AU - Gerlak, Andrea K.
AU - Mumme, Stephen P.
AU - Flessa, Karl W.
AU - Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A.
AU - Scott, Christopher A.
AU - Pablos, Nicolás Pineda
AU - Megdal, Sharon B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - The United States and Mexico have engaged in hydrodiplomacy—a practice of transboundary water management that blends water diplomacy and science diplomacy–for more than 75 years, since the adoption of the Treaty of 1944 and the creation of the International Boundary and Water Commission. We examine six major turning points in U.S.-Mexico hydrodiplomacy to ascertain the key factors in the region's history of resolving transboundary water issues. We find that recognized adaptive governance indicators—such as social learning, sustained relationships, flexible governance mechanisms, and state and non-state networks are essential elements of hydrodiplomacy. Our research suggests that robust and foundational institutions comprise another key indicator of adaptive governance specifically in transboundary contexts. A commitment to both science and diplomacy have been important components underlying the effectiveness of hydrodiplomacy in the border region. Binational networks involving diverse state and non-state actors at multiple scales have increasingly played a pivotal role in shaping desirable hydrodiplomatic outcomes in the region.
AB - The United States and Mexico have engaged in hydrodiplomacy—a practice of transboundary water management that blends water diplomacy and science diplomacy–for more than 75 years, since the adoption of the Treaty of 1944 and the creation of the International Boundary and Water Commission. We examine six major turning points in U.S.-Mexico hydrodiplomacy to ascertain the key factors in the region's history of resolving transboundary water issues. We find that recognized adaptive governance indicators—such as social learning, sustained relationships, flexible governance mechanisms, and state and non-state networks are essential elements of hydrodiplomacy. Our research suggests that robust and foundational institutions comprise another key indicator of adaptive governance specifically in transboundary contexts. A commitment to both science and diplomacy have been important components underlying the effectiveness of hydrodiplomacy in the border region. Binational networks involving diverse state and non-state actors at multiple scales have increasingly played a pivotal role in shaping desirable hydrodiplomatic outcomes in the region.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086912374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086912374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 32834775
AN - SCOPUS:85086912374
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 112
SP - 189
EP - 202
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
ER -