TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypofractionated radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell skin cancer
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
AU - Lee, Charles T.
AU - Zhang, Eddie
AU - Keith, Scott W.
AU - Galloway, Thomas J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Purpose: To characterize the cosmetic outcomes and local recurrence (LR) rates of various hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) regimens for skin basal and squamous cell cancers (BCCs/SCCs). Methods: A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was performed to identify 344 articles published between 1985–2016 evaluating patients with T1–2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive RT. Biologically equivalent doses with α/β = 3 (BED3s) were calculated. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between BED3 and cosmetic outcomes. Results: A total of 21 studies were identified detailing the treatment of 9729 skin BCC/SCC patients, across seven countries, with external beam RT (n = 9255) or brachytherapy (n = 474). Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 12–77). Median dose was 45 Gy/11 fractions (interquartile range: 37.5 Gy/6–55 Gy/18) at 4 Gy/fraction (interquartile range: 2.5–6 Gy); most hypofractionated 18.75 Gy/1. There was a trend to decreased “good” cosmesis with higher total dose: −3.4% “good” cosmesis/10 Gy BED3, p = 0.01. Similarly, there was a trend to increased “fair” cosmesis with higher dose: +3.8% “fair” cosmesis/10 Gy BED3 p = 0.006. At a BED3 of 100 Gy, the expected rate of “good” cosmesis is 79% (95% confidence interval: 70%, 88%). Hypofractionated schedules produced similar cosmesis to conventionally fractionated schedules, at the same BED3. Fewer than 8% of patients experienced “poor” cosmesis, independent of dose or fractionation regimen. Conclusion: Hypofractionated RT has favorable cosmesis for patients with skin BCCs/SCCs. We recommend clinicians consider these commonly-used regimens, which all have BED3 of ∼100 Gy: 50 Gy/15 fractions, 36.75 Gy/7 fractions, or 35 Gy/5 fractions, as they result in “good” cosmesis in 80% of patients.
AB - Purpose: To characterize the cosmetic outcomes and local recurrence (LR) rates of various hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) regimens for skin basal and squamous cell cancers (BCCs/SCCs). Methods: A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was performed to identify 344 articles published between 1985–2016 evaluating patients with T1–2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive RT. Biologically equivalent doses with α/β = 3 (BED3s) were calculated. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between BED3 and cosmetic outcomes. Results: A total of 21 studies were identified detailing the treatment of 9729 skin BCC/SCC patients, across seven countries, with external beam RT (n = 9255) or brachytherapy (n = 474). Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 12–77). Median dose was 45 Gy/11 fractions (interquartile range: 37.5 Gy/6–55 Gy/18) at 4 Gy/fraction (interquartile range: 2.5–6 Gy); most hypofractionated 18.75 Gy/1. There was a trend to decreased “good” cosmesis with higher total dose: −3.4% “good” cosmesis/10 Gy BED3, p = 0.01. Similarly, there was a trend to increased “fair” cosmesis with higher dose: +3.8% “fair” cosmesis/10 Gy BED3 p = 0.006. At a BED3 of 100 Gy, the expected rate of “good” cosmesis is 79% (95% confidence interval: 70%, 88%). Hypofractionated schedules produced similar cosmesis to conventionally fractionated schedules, at the same BED3. Fewer than 8% of patients experienced “poor” cosmesis, independent of dose or fractionation regimen. Conclusion: Hypofractionated RT has favorable cosmesis for patients with skin BCCs/SCCs. We recommend clinicians consider these commonly-used regimens, which all have BED3 of ∼100 Gy: 50 Gy/15 fractions, 36.75 Gy/7 fractions, or 35 Gy/5 fractions, as they result in “good” cosmesis in 80% of patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028347326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028347326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.011
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28843727
AN - SCOPUS:85028347326
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 125
SP - 13
EP - 20
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -