TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Best Practices in Financing Next Generation Networks
AU - Frieden, Rob
N1 - Funding Information:
Some nations cap funding to a percentage of the total project cost to encourage community champions to find additional sources of funding. For example, Canada’s primary broadband development program caps funding at 50%, thereby requiring project applicants to seek out additional financial support and to plan for self-sufficiency:
Funding Information:
Carrier Consortia. A longstanding and successful strategy for spreading risk and sharing an investment burden involves the creation of a consortium of commercial ventures, typically incumbent telecommunications carriers, augmented with grants, loans, loan guarantees, and other financial support from governments and government-supported banks. The consortium model has provided Africa with several new, state-of-the-art long-haul fiber-optic cable networks that will provide Internet connectivity to many unserved or underserved regions. The SAT3/WASC (Southern Africa–Western Africa Submarine Cable) fiber-optic cable extends for 15,000 km, linking Europe with South Africa and a number of countries on the West African coastline. This cable network interconnects with the SAFE (South Africa–Far East) cable that adds 13,800 km and links Malaysia, via Reunion and Mauritius, with a landing at India (SAT-3/WASC/SAFE n.d.).
Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Governments throughout the world have determined that next generation network (NGN) development serves the national interest. The strategies used to achieve progress vary greatly, as does the extent to which governments perceive the need to get actively involved through direct ownership or subsidization of carriers. No government has unlimited funds to invest in new networks, or to subsidize private ventures promising to improve access to essential services at affordable rates. Accordingly, nations must determine whether and how to use limited taxpayer funds to expedite the access to inexpensive and ubiquitous wired and wireless broadband networks. Baseline factors such as geography, income, demographics, and market penetration of existing networks have a significant impact on what works best. However, nations with similar physical and economic characteristics have pursued significantly different strategies. This article identifies best practices in NGN development using both case studies and a review of the current literature assessing government strategies. While it cannot confirm a theoretical basis for achieving success in NGN development, the article provides a toolkit of confirmed best practices.
AB - Governments throughout the world have determined that next generation network (NGN) development serves the national interest. The strategies used to achieve progress vary greatly, as does the extent to which governments perceive the need to get actively involved through direct ownership or subsidization of carriers. No government has unlimited funds to invest in new networks, or to subsidize private ventures promising to improve access to essential services at affordable rates. Accordingly, nations must determine whether and how to use limited taxpayer funds to expedite the access to inexpensive and ubiquitous wired and wireless broadband networks. Baseline factors such as geography, income, demographics, and market penetration of existing networks have a significant impact on what works best. However, nations with similar physical and economic characteristics have pursued significantly different strategies. This article identifies best practices in NGN development using both case studies and a review of the current literature assessing government strategies. While it cannot confirm a theoretical basis for achieving success in NGN development, the article provides a toolkit of confirmed best practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880277115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880277115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01972243.2013.792305
DO - 10.1080/01972243.2013.792305
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880277115
SN - 0197-2243
VL - 29
SP - 234
EP - 247
JO - Information Society
JF - Information Society
IS - 4
ER -