Identifying smart city archetypes from the bottom up: A content analysis of municipal plans

Zhiwei Tang; Krishna Jayakar; Xiaodong Feng; Huiping Zhang; Rachel X. Peng

doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834

Identifying smart city archetypes from the bottom up: A content analysis of municipal plans

Zhiwei Tang, Krishna Jayakar, Xiaodong Feng, Huiping Zhang, Rachel X. Peng

Telecommunications

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of 60 municipal smart city plans drawn from countries around the world, with the goal of enumerating the specific policies and programs that are included under the general rubric of “smart city” initiatives. The objective is to identify the combinations of projects that are most often deployed together, and thus to define “archetypes” or “models” in smart city development. We follow an inductive method and conduct content analysis of 60 smart city plans, with each plan coded for the presence or absence of activity in 25 program categories. Cluster analysis identified four different models: an essential services model, smart transportation model, broad spectrum model, and a business ecosystem model.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	101834
Journal	Telecommunications Policy
Volume	43
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834
State	Published - Nov 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Human Factors and Ergonomics
Information Systems
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834

Cite this

@article{84a7f8b9b57b4940946be1fc45df31fd,

title = "Identifying smart city archetypes from the bottom up: A content analysis of municipal plans",

abstract = "This paper presents a comparative analysis of 60 municipal smart city plans drawn from countries around the world, with the goal of enumerating the specific policies and programs that are included under the general rubric of “smart city” initiatives. The objective is to identify the combinations of projects that are most often deployed together, and thus to define “archetypes” or “models” in smart city development. We follow an inductive method and conduct content analysis of 60 smart city plans, with each plan coded for the presence or absence of activity in 25 program categories. Cluster analysis identified four different models: an essential services model, smart transportation model, broad spectrum model, and a business ecosystem model.",

author = "Zhiwei Tang and Krishna Jayakar and Xiaodong Feng and Huiping Zhang and Peng, {Rachel X.}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17BGL263 ).",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

journal = "Telecommunications Policy",

issn = "0308-5961",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying smart city archetypes from the bottom up

T2 - A content analysis of municipal plans

AU - Tang, Zhiwei

AU - Jayakar, Krishna

AU - Feng, Xiaodong

AU - Zhang, Huiping

AU - Peng, Rachel X.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17BGL263 ).

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - This paper presents a comparative analysis of 60 municipal smart city plans drawn from countries around the world, with the goal of enumerating the specific policies and programs that are included under the general rubric of “smart city” initiatives. The objective is to identify the combinations of projects that are most often deployed together, and thus to define “archetypes” or “models” in smart city development. We follow an inductive method and conduct content analysis of 60 smart city plans, with each plan coded for the presence or absence of activity in 25 program categories. Cluster analysis identified four different models: an essential services model, smart transportation model, broad spectrum model, and a business ecosystem model.

AB - This paper presents a comparative analysis of 60 municipal smart city plans drawn from countries around the world, with the goal of enumerating the specific policies and programs that are included under the general rubric of “smart city” initiatives. The objective is to identify the combinations of projects that are most often deployed together, and thus to define “archetypes” or “models” in smart city development. We follow an inductive method and conduct content analysis of 60 smart city plans, with each plan coded for the presence or absence of activity in 25 program categories. Cluster analysis identified four different models: an essential services model, smart transportation model, broad spectrum model, and a business ecosystem model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068409986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068409986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834

DO - 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101834

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068409986

SN - 0308-5961

VL - 43

JO - Telecommunications Policy

JF - Telecommunications Policy

IS - 10

M1 - 101834

ER -

Identifying smart city archetypes from the bottom up: A content analysis of municipal plans

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this