TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying the Impacts of Acne
T2 - A Delphi Survey of Patients and Clinicians
AU - Tan, Jerry
AU - Frey, Marc P.
AU - Thiboutot, Diane
AU - Layton, Alison
AU - Eady, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Background: Acne can adversely impact those affected in multiple dimensions. The purpose of this study was to determine the most prominent impacts identified by acne patients and by clinicians. Methods: Independent Delphi surveys for acne patients and clinicians were conducted to achieve consensus regarding acne impacts within each group. Acne patients were recruited from outpatient clinics of authors (AL, JT, and DT). The first phase involved qualitative responses, where emergent themes were identified and used to generate items for 2 subsequent phases. Results: The qualitative phase generated 64 items in 3 themes: psychological, sociological, and treatment related. These items were independently ranked in importance by patients and by clinicians. Consensus for importance was achieved for 34 items by patients and 43 by clinicians. Patient-identified highest ranked items were being self-conscious, feeling unattractive, feeling uncomfortable in own skin, unattractive to others, would not want pictures taken, envious of people with clear skin, and time/effort spent concealing scarring; while clinicians identified feeling unattractive. Conclusions: We identify acne impacts within psychological, sociological, and treatment-related domains by acne patients and clinicians. Further, we establish discrepancies between patients and clinicians regarding the impact of acne. This provides evidence for the importance of establishing patient-reported outcomes.
AB - Background: Acne can adversely impact those affected in multiple dimensions. The purpose of this study was to determine the most prominent impacts identified by acne patients and by clinicians. Methods: Independent Delphi surveys for acne patients and clinicians were conducted to achieve consensus regarding acne impacts within each group. Acne patients were recruited from outpatient clinics of authors (AL, JT, and DT). The first phase involved qualitative responses, where emergent themes were identified and used to generate items for 2 subsequent phases. Results: The qualitative phase generated 64 items in 3 themes: psychological, sociological, and treatment related. These items were independently ranked in importance by patients and by clinicians. Consensus for importance was achieved for 34 items by patients and 43 by clinicians. Patient-identified highest ranked items were being self-conscious, feeling unattractive, feeling uncomfortable in own skin, unattractive to others, would not want pictures taken, envious of people with clear skin, and time/effort spent concealing scarring; while clinicians identified feeling unattractive. Conclusions: We identify acne impacts within psychological, sociological, and treatment-related domains by acne patients and clinicians. Further, we establish discrepancies between patients and clinicians regarding the impact of acne. This provides evidence for the importance of establishing patient-reported outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081641925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081641925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1203475420907088
DO - 10.1177/1203475420907088
M3 - Article
C2 - 32096429
AN - SCOPUS:85081641925
SN - 1203-4754
VL - 24
SP - 259
EP - 266
JO - Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
JF - Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
IS - 3
ER -