Abstract
Relying on a formal theoretical model, Gary Cox demonstrates that single member districts induce candidates toward policy positions at their constituency median while multimember districts encourage dispersion. We test this theoretical implication in the context of the Arizona state legislature, in which each legislative district chooses one senator and two representatives in single member and multimember contests respectively. To do so, we generate W-NOMINATE estimates of scores based on roll-call data from the Arizona state legislature that are comparable across chambers (Senate and House). Our results are substantially less supportive of the formal theory than are those of prior studies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 347-368 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 137 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ideological extremism and electoral design. Multimember versus single member districts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver