TY - GEN
T1 - Impact of additive manufacturing on internal cooling channels with varying diameters and build directions
AU - Wildgoose, Alexander J.
AU - Thole, Karen A.
AU - Sanders, Paul
AU - Wang, Lieke
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to recognize the technical guidance and funding provided by Siemens Energy and the U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory. As well as acknowledge the cooperative efforts in fabricating the coupons with Corey Dickman and members at Penn State’s CIMP-3D lab. The authors thank Timothy Stecko at Penn State’s Center for Quantitative Imaging for performing the CT scans. This paper is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0031760. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 ASME
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The use of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, such as direct metal laser sintering, provides the design freedom required to incorporate complex cooling schemes in gas turbine components. Additively manufactured turbine components have a range of cooling feature sizes and, because of the inherent three-dimensionality, a wide range of build angles. Previous studies have shown that AM build directions influence internal channel surface roughness that, in turn, augment heat transfer and pressure loss. This study investigates the impact of additive manufacturing on channel feature size and build direction relative to tolerance, surface roughness, pressure losses, and convective cooling. Multiple AM coupons were built from Inconel 718 consisting of channels with different diameters and a variety of build directions. An experimental rig was used to measure pressure drop to calculate friction factor and was used to impose a constant surface temperature boundary condition to collect Nusselt number over a range of Reynolds numbers. Significant variations in surface roughness and geometric deviations from the design intent were observed for distinct build directions and channel sizes. These differences led to notable impacts in friction factor and Nusselt number augmentations, which were a strong function of build angle.
AB - The use of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, such as direct metal laser sintering, provides the design freedom required to incorporate complex cooling schemes in gas turbine components. Additively manufactured turbine components have a range of cooling feature sizes and, because of the inherent three-dimensionality, a wide range of build angles. Previous studies have shown that AM build directions influence internal channel surface roughness that, in turn, augment heat transfer and pressure loss. This study investigates the impact of additive manufacturing on channel feature size and build direction relative to tolerance, surface roughness, pressure losses, and convective cooling. Multiple AM coupons were built from Inconel 718 consisting of channels with different diameters and a variety of build directions. An experimental rig was used to measure pressure drop to calculate friction factor and was used to impose a constant surface temperature boundary condition to collect Nusselt number over a range of Reynolds numbers. Significant variations in surface roughness and geometric deviations from the design intent were observed for distinct build directions and channel sizes. These differences led to notable impacts in friction factor and Nusselt number augmentations, which were a strong function of build angle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099788186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099788186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/GT2020-15049
DO - 10.1115/GT2020-15049
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85099788186
T3 - Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
BT - Heat Transfer
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2020
Y2 - 21 September 2020 through 25 September 2020
ER -